Writ petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner's inability to provide instructions and uncertainty regarding trial court status.
Proceedings in C.C.No.334 of 2012 quashable petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD
.
FRIDAY THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMdER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
1 CRIMINAL PETITION NO:8697 OF 2e15
Between:
...PETITIONERYACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDENT NO.1
...RESPONDENT NO.2/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the.l-ligh Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in C.C.No. 334 of 2012 on the file of the Court or lX [/etropolitan Magistrate Court Cyberabad at Kukatpally against the petitioner/ Accused in the interest ofjustice.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2015(CRLP MP. NO: 8728 OF 20151
Petitlon under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings .including appearance of the petitioner / Accused in cc.no.33412012 on the file of the court of lX Metropolitan Magistrate court Cyberabad at Kukatpally pending disposal of the main
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K K MAHENDER REDDY & pERt PRABHAKAR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and thepublic prosecutor (TG) on behalf ofthe Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
I ,
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8697 OF 2015
ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is Iiled by the petitioner/accused under Section 482, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.334 of 2Ol2 on the file of the Court of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Kukkatpally.
2
the best efforts and in the absence of the assistance arrd
persuasion of the petitioner, this Court is also handicapped.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGITRAR
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFICER
To,
NS
b
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1011112023
ORDER
CRLP.No.8697 of 2015
1 $E STA r{i
q
J
Uo 1 1 ,iAri 2!24 t)z
t=
, ? 1,.
THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS D!SMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS @."po
<sup>yk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC is maintainable despite lack of instructions from the petitioner and inability to ascertain trial court proceedings.
Whether the High Court can dismiss the petition as infructuous without excluding statutory remedies.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dungrothu Nagaraju
The State of Telangana
Smt.B.Uma
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
