Single judge of the High Court of Telangana disposed of a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings in a DVC case. The court held that the cause of action did not survive, and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Criminal Petition No. 14958 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I3299I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14958 OF 2014
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the record relating to the in DVC No. 163 of 2014 on the file of lll Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, and quash the proceedings therein.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 15538 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of DVC No. 163 of 2014, dated on the file of on the file of lll Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad
l.A. NO: 2OF 2O14rcRLPMP. NO: 15842OF20141
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in DVC.No.163/2014 on.the file of the Ill Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Crl.P
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. Ruhi, Learned Counsel representing by Sri M A K MUKHEED, Advocate for the Petitioners and the of Sri S. Ganesh Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appears for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
I I
t I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 14958 oF 20L4
ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is frled seeking to quash the proceedings in D.V.C.No.163 of 2Ol4 on the file of the learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
4 Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes no objection to the same
2
1
MiscellaneousPetitions, pendingif any, shall stald closed'
SD/- T. VIJAY KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BJLB
l^d T
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/11/2023
'( g STAT5 o
2[2[
o [ 4 JIN
t
t
D E S PA1 C-,
ORDER
CRLP.No.14958 ot 2014
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
aL \r,'3
r $_l{-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of proceedings should be allowed or dismissed as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Padma Priya Shabada
Chandra Shekar Yalakki
State of Telangana
Chika Yalakki
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
