The High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings. The court held the petition infructuous due to the petitioner's unavailability, failure to ascertain the trial court's status, and lack of assistance provided to the counsel.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH @URT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABADI
3299 I
FII.D4Y,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER rul/O THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
RIMINAL P TIT NO:86 OF 015
Between:
n:H[:l.'H:ffi :?i"il?,t3::,?{{r#ff,o,1",^?"T,.:,"^5HNooff ?,?rn+r*,,ruiv"ti Saroomagar Mandal, Ranga
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1.The State of Telangana, rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
2.gIt_F. I,tma, wo B. Uma Mahe_swara Rao, Ased abour 39 r"rd, BE""EroJ,3!NT No.1 FU. oFtat No. 40S, Btock ruo.a, cSn nesiie-ricr]ilru-ol-iH M;di'il; wr};,-*?il,'g"irp"rrv Mandar, Ransa Avvappa soiiety,
^"ror%?.t/#,10,
... RESPONDENT NO.ZCOMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 4g2 of.Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of-Criminat pliiti""] t't,"'Xtgh Cor,t ;y ;" pr".."j t" QUASH the Proccedinos in c.c.No. ssz ot idri' on the file of the court of rx Metropotitan Magistrate-cou.t cyueiaoao at irr.-ripir; rgrinst the petitioner/ Accused in the interest of justice.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri K.K. Mahender Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and of sri s. GaneJ, Assistant pubric prosecutor oG) on behalf of the Respondent No.,l .
The Court made the following ORDER :
I I
THT HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E' V' VENUGOPAL CRIMINALPETITIONN0.86940F 2015
ORDER:
Thepresent Criminal Petition is frled bythe petitioner/accused underSection 482 Cr'P'C' seeking to quash theproceedingsinC.C.No.332of2o|2onthefiIeoflearned IX MetropolitanMagistrateCourt, Cyberabad'Kukkatpally'
3, Mr.S.Ganesh,learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearingfor the respondent-state is present.No representation on behalfof the unofficial respondent'
l
I
\
:
2
best efforts and in the absence of the assistance and pursuance of the petitioner, this Court is also handicapped.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shatl starrd closed.
To
Sd/-T,JAYASREE ASSISTANTAEGISTRAR IITRUECOPYII secrr*frprcen
I
l.II35"T?11?|""EL',jl,|",g;1,tt-"cesrtc^yberabadatKukarpary.,_ e.oneccrosnt.'KRilhi{tffjE"{#fJr9:,x.?9.,6fl fl"6o1aiou, 4.Two CD Copies.
w
HIGH COURT
DATED:10.11.2023
I
1
t<br>
ORDER
CRLP.No.8694 of 2015
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
+cr'4 X{"
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings can be maintained when the trial court status is unknown and the petitioner is uncontacted.
Whether the petition should be dismissed as infructuous in the absence of assistance from the petitioner to ascertain trial court status.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Guntur Saroomagar Mandal Average C.D. Compounder
State of Telangana, rep. by its public prosecutor
G. Uma Maheswara Rao
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
