Dismissed

Rajesh Mittal, S/o.Late Sri Rameshwar Das, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Jul 2023CRLP/8634/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana heard a criminal petition invoking Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR. The Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the case was already reclassified as civil by the police, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court, recording this submission, dismissed the petition as operates varying as per the court order without engaging with any prior legal precedents. No furth

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 8634 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous.

Rajesh Mittal, S/o.Late Sri Rameshwar Das, Vs The State… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32ee ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAI- PETIT]ON NO: 8634 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

Rajesh lvlittal, .Sio Lale sri Rameshwar Das, occ: Government Service, Rl/o. plot No.74, Road No.4, Piashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-Sb0 096: .^---'

¶9

,..PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 . T.he State of Telangana, rept., by its public prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶12

Sri.Alok Srivastava, IPS (Retd.), Rl/o.plot No.115, prashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 096.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the F.l.R. dt.17.4.2014 in crime No.226 of 2o1i on the file of P.S. Rayadurgam, Cyberabad

¶15

CRLPMP. NO: 10971 oF 2017

¶16

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the 2nd respondent to file a the additional- affidavit and additional material papers in Crl.Petition No.8634 of 2014.

¶17

CRLPMP. NO:8232 oF 2014

¶18

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in crime No.226 of 2o1[on the file of P.S.Rayadurgam, Cyberabad, pending disposal of the petition and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice.

¶19

CRLPMP. NO: 14354 OF 2014

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition; the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders^passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 1 1.O9.201 4 in Crl.P.No.86341201 4.

¶21

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K RAMAMOHAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant^{PublicProsecutor} on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and K VENKATA RAO, for the Respondent No.2

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

¶24

¶25

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL}

¶26

CRIM^{INALPETITION No.8634 OF 2Ol4}

¶27

o RDER:

¶28

ThepresentCriminalPetitionisfiledunderSection4S2of Cr.P.C.seekingtoquashtheF.I.R.datedlT.o4.2ol4inCrime No.226 of^{2Ol4 on the file of P'S' Raidurgam' Cyberabad'}

¶29

Heard^{Mr. Sai, learned counsel representingMr' K' Rama} MohanMahadeva,learnedcounselforthepetitionerand Mr.^{yizarathAli, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing} for the^{resPondent State'}

¶30

3.LearnedAssistantPublicProsecutorvideletterdated tg.oT.2023addressedbytheSub.InspectorofPolice,Raidurgam p.S., Cyberabad Commissionerate^{submittedthat the case has} been^{referredto as "civil in nature" on 31.07.2019as per the} proceedings^{of Assistant Commissionerof Police' Madhapurand} no further^{orders are necessa-ry inthis criminalPetition.} Therefore,^{seeks to dismissthe criminal Petitionas infructuous.}

¶31

4 RecordingthesubmissionsmadebythelearnedAssistant Public^{Prosecutor,theCriminal Petition isdismissedas} infructuous.

¶32

)

¶33

Miscelianeous Petitions, pending if any, shal1 stand closed.

Sd/.K.VENKAIAH

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

,-.fb

SECTION OFFICER

The Vlll Metropolitan Magistrate at^{Rajendranagar,, Cyberabad.}

¶42

Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,^{High Court for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OPUC]

¶43

J. The Station House Officer, Raidurgam Police Station,^{Cyberabad District.} 4. One CC to SRl. K RAMAMOHAN, Advocate [OPUC]

¶44

One CC to SRl. KAKARA VENKATA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

¶45

Two CD Copies

fr^q.

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1910712023

ORDER

.,;:iTATf
I
c)() ?i [uB?$8
;l
\lt.\ t

CRLP.No.8634 of 2014

DISMISSING THE CRL.P

AS INFRUCTUOUS

t^?", . +\a >s

Rajesh Mittal, S/o.Late Sri Rameshwar Das, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Mittal, S/o.Late Sri Rameshwar Das, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gandla Srinivasa Rao, Khammam Dt. Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Satya Prakash Jindal , Nikku Bai Vs The State of Telangana

N.Krishna Reddy, West Bengal and Anr., Vs State of Ap., Rep. Pp and 3 Otrs.

Dattatreya Vs the State of Telangana, Rep., Pp and Another

Chinta Veera Bhadra Rao, Medchal Dt., Vs Chinta Nagabhadramani, Medchal Dt and 2 Otrs, Rep Pp.

Lt. Col. a.. Pragathi Kumar, Hyd Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.