Dismissed

Satya Prakash Jindal , Nikku Bai v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Jul 2023CRLP/8442/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash an FIR. The petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. The Court observed the cause did not survive and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, closing all related miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the criminal petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn; all related miscellaneous petitions closed.

Satya Prakash Jindal , Nikku Bai Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32ee l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIM INAL PETITION No: 8442 OF 2015

¶7

Between:

¶8

Satya Prakash Jindal @ Nikku Bai, S/o Jugal^{Kishore Jindal, Age:42years,} Oci Business, F/o Flat No.102, Chipendale^{Apartments, Blocks-A,Opp} Cigarefte Factory, RTC X Roads, Musheerabad,^Hyderabad.

¶9

Prashanth Kumar, S/o Ram Nivas, Aged^{about 35 years, Occ Business,Rl/o} 15-S-328, 4th Floor, Fish Market, Feelkhana, Hyderabad.

¶10

Govind Rathi, S/o Balakishan Rati,^{Aged 32 years,Occ Business,F/o 3-6-} 780, Flat No.302, Street No.l 1, Himayat^{Nagar, Hyderabad.}

¶11

Dilip Kumar, S/o not known. Occ^{Business, R/o '153-253, Near Fish Market,} Feelkhana, Hyderabad.

¶12

...Petitioner/Accused.3, 10 lo 12

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, Rep. its Public^{Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.}

¶15

...RespondenUComPlainant

¶16

Petition under Section^uE2 of^{Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition, the High Court rnay} be^pleased to call for^{the records pertaining to FIR No.180of 2015 daled 21-O7-} 2015 on the file of^{PS- Ramgopalpet and quash same to the petitionefs} concerned.

¶17

CRLPMP. NO: 82167 OF 2015

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay} be^pleased to stay all^{further proceedingsin FlR.No.180of 2015 dated21-07-} 2015, including arrest^{of petitioners No.2 & 4 (Accused No.10 & 12) pending} disposal of the above Crl.P.

¶19

) i I I I i I I I I lI i I I ! I I I I

¶20

CRLPMP. NO: 11044,^|F 2015

¶21

Petition under ;()ction 482 of Cr.P.C^praying th;rt^{in lh,,) circumstances} stated in the Memor: rdum of Grounds of Criminal Petit on,^the High^Courtmay be pleased to extencl he interim orders^pleased to^pass,:d bv^th s^{1-on'bleCourt} in CRL.P.No.8442 '> ?-O15 on 07-10-2015 for until^{'urtherr)rdors,pending} disposal of the abo,;e )r mrnal^petition.

¶22

CRLPMP. NO: 1025=2_ [i 2015

¶23

Petition under ir:ction 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in .h{) circumstances stated in the Memora lcum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, tt e High Court^may be pleased to extenri :he interim orders^pleased to^passed by this llon'ble Court in Crl.P.No.B442120^ | cn 04-09-2015 for until further orcers,^per-rding disposal of the above Crl.P

¶24

This Petition : rnring on for hearing, upon perus ng th,-' Vernorandum of Grounds of Crimin,r^tretition and upon hearing the argurr 3ntr; of Sri GL NARASIMHA RAO ACvocate for the Petitioner an,i the^/\ss stant Public Prosecutor on behal' rf the Sole Respondent.

¶25

The Court made theⁱ )llowing: ORDER

¶26

HOT{OURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶27

CRIMIT{AL PETITION No.8.142 of 2015

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

This Criminal Petition is hled seeking to call for the records pertaining to FIR No.180 of 2015, dated 21.O7.2O15 on the file of Police Station Ramgopalpet and quash the same to the petitioners.

¶30

When the matter is taken-up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the criminal petition does not survive for adjudication. Therefore, seeks permissi,on of this Court to withdraw the criminal petition.

¶31

Permission is accorded.

¶32

karned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State takes no objection for the same.

¶33

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal

¶35

petition, shall also stand closed.

¶36

Sd/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c1h

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Xlth Additional Chief^{Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad.}

¶41

Crrn,l-J

¶42

The Station H: tse Officer, Ramgopalpet Police Sta ion, Hyderacad District

¶43

Two CCs to tlt Fublic Prosecutor, High Court for the Statrr r,,f Tt:langana at Hyderabad.(Cl T,

¶44

One CC to SF:l Gt NARASIMHA RAO, Advocate K)PUCI

¶45

Two CD Copi<:

kam

?rrtQ.

HIGH COUR'I

DATED:1810'7^t2023

ii^".., iTAI
/':t',
ti ri
)
) . I r.uG ?ut ..-, l l
+,j

¶51

ORDER

¶52

CRLP.No.84'42 of 2015

¶53

THE CRIMINI.L PETITION IS DISMISSED S WITHDRAWN '

¶54

?fl-0., r.^\e\28

Satya Prakash Jindal , Nikku Bai v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satya Prakash Jindal , Nikku Bai v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kambam Venkat Reddy , Venkaiah Vs the State of Ap., and 2 Others

Y.Venu Babu, Krishna Dt., Vs Mrs.Swathi Reddy, Hyd and Anr, Rep Pp.

B. Prabhakar Reddy, Hyd Vs P.P., Hyd and 2 Othrs

Gandla Srinivasa Rao, Khammam Dt. Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

N.Krishna Reddy, West Bengal and Anr., Vs State of Ap., Rep. Pp and 3 Otrs.

Nayeem Khan, R.R.Dist. Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano