The High Court dismissed the criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of investigation as infructuous because the investigation was completed and the charge sheet had been filed.
The Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous on the ground that investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32es ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITI NO:6813 OF 2015
Between:
DATTATREYA, S/o. Muriladhar Rao, Occ Pvt Emp,R/o. SantoshNagar, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER/ACCUSEO No.3
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Call for records in Crime No. 21 1 of 2015 of P.S Langer House on the file of Vl Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Nampally Hyderabad,quash the same in the interest ofjustice.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(CRLPMP. NO: 6710 OF 2015
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased To Stay all further proceedings in Crime No. 2'l 1 of 2015 of P.S Langer House on the file of Vl Addl. Cheif Metropolitan Magistrate Nampally Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the ltrlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M/S P RANA PRAVEER AND KAMALASAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri Vizarath Ali, Learned Asst Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following ORDER :
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.68l3 oF 2011t
ORDER:
The presenr crinri.air ,r'tirion is filed under Sec-ion 4g2 of cr.P c secking trr calr lirr thr' :-.cords in crime No.21r of 2015 or P.S. Larger House on rhe filr: of learned VI Additicnal Chief Metropolitan Masistratc, Nanr peLlly, Hyderabad amd quash the same.
\ \ -' __tl
\E
)
file of thelearnedVI AssistantChief MetropolitanMagistrate' Nampaily.Therefore, seeksto dismissthe Criminal Petition
5 Recordingthe submissions made by the learned Assistant PublicProsecutor,the Criminal Petitioni sdismissed AS infructuous.
\
MiscellaneousPetitions,pendingifany,shallstandclosed. sd/-NAYAN| "^1tt3fit i'#H&EtR //rRuEcoPY// 4
SECTIONOFFICER
3.OneCC to Sri P Rana Praveer& Kamalasan' 46v661e [OPUCI
4.Two CCsto Public Prosecutor' High Court for the Stateof Telangana (OUT)
5.Two CD CoPies
BJLB
DL
g
tI I
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/07/2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.681 3 of 2015
(;i \F. -.:-l--__:-.-\ :; f .lIA t''.<br>.(
) ruBzffi J,I
t2 ).
CRMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
@n1d $t",-{'lto
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings should be allowed or dismissed as the investigation was completed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dattatreya
State of Telangana
M Venkateshwar Goud
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
