Allowed

Syed Akram Ahmed v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Feb 2023CRLP/8074/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal petition and accompanying I.A.s, the Telangana High Court allowed the petition to compound Cognizable Non-Bailable offences under IPC Sections 4, 6, and 320(1) via a joint compromise. The court ordered quashing of proceedings in C.C. No. 166 of 2018 and directed the accused to pay Rs. 10,000 to Samridhi Welfare.

What did the court decide?

Allowed Criminal Petition No. 8074 of 2022 and I.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2022; quashed proceedings in C.C. No. 166 of 2018; directed payment of Rs. 10,000 to Director Samridhi Welfare.

Syed Akram Ahmed Vs the State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s1 I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION No: 8074 OF 2022

¶7

ALONG WITH LA.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2022

¶8

Between:

¶9

Syed Akram Ahmed, S/o Syed.Sadiq Ahmqd, Aged about_ 31 years., Occ_ Private Emptoyee( Repre3enred tjv c.Fli 5v"o^"sioiq ptA no 2) ...petitioner/Accused No.i'

¶10

Syed Sadiq, S/o Late Syed Ahmed, Aged about 52 years., Occ_ Un employed, ..petitioner/Accused No.2

¶11

Parveen Sultana, Wo Syed Sadiq. Aged about,48 years., Occ_ House holds Petitioner/Accused No.3

¶12

4 Syeda Nazneen, D/o Syed Sadiq. Aged abou! 30 years, Occ_ House holds Petitioner/Accused No.4

¶13

Syed Taihmoor Ahmed, S/o Syed Sadrq. Aged about- 25 years., OccStudent, ...Petitioner/Accused No.5

¶14

All Ryo 8-4-68/'l41,Ali Nagar, Bandlaguda, Chandrayangutta,Hyderabad

¶15

AND

¶16

THE STATE OF TELANGaNA, Through public prosecutor, T.S. High court Hyd. P.S W.P.S.SOUTH ZONE

¶17

Amtul F.lrlg.unt @ Sameena,. W/o. Syed Akram Ahmed Aged 28 years,Occ_ House holds No 23-1-102011024, Moghalpura Cha;;in;i Hyderabad

¶18

...Respondents

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praytng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may b:.ql"q:gO.!g qgash the proceedings in CC no 166 of 2018, pending on rhe fites of Hon'ble XV Additionar chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Manorarijan .o.fi., Hyderabad in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of lusiice.

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2022

¶21

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr'P C prayingthat in the circumslances} stated in the^{[,4emorandun]of Groundsof criminalPetition,theHigh courtmay} be pleased to^{permit petilioncraccusedno 2 to act as G P A on behalfof} p"tiion"rlr..r.Ld no1 in the^{presentquash procee} -ings .in^{caseVideC C No'} i oo ot zot a on the^{f rlC ot xvAdditionalchief I,4etropolitan Magistrate,} lvla noranjan Complex^{Hyde ra [)ild.}

¶22

l.A. Nos: 2 and³ of²⁰²²

¶23

Between:

¶24

Amtul Haleem @^{Sameena. W/oSyedAkram Ahmed, Aged28 years'Occ-} rior.u rloroi nE' is'l^-tozo'toza '^{Moghalpura Charminar,Hyderabad}

¶25

...Petitioner/comPlainant

¶26

AND

¶27

THE STATE^{OF TELANCANA, Through Public prosecutor'T'S High cou(} Hyd. P.S W.P.S^{SOUTH ZONE}

¶28

...ResPondents/No'1

¶29

' 2 Flirr,:' Sved Alram^'Ep.ir"" Alrmc'j S^- ' rc'seqteo^{Svod Sadiq} dy^Ahmed G PA^{Aged about- 31} So...iit'rt."l'j*^years il3.r')'^Occ-

¶30

I l l I I I I I I I

¶31

Syed Sadrq,^S o^{L 1, Sycd Ahmed Aged} -^{about-5-2 years} '^Occ-Un employed. " 'Respondent^No'3

¶32

Parveen Sultana,^{W/o Svr:d Sadrq. Agedabou!48 years} '^{Occ- Households} ...ResPondent^No'4

¶33

Syeda Nazneen,^{D/o Syr:d Sadiq.Aged abou!30 years} '^{Occ- Households} . '.ResPondent^No'5

¶34

Syed Taihmoor^{Ahmerl S/o Syed Sadiq,Aged} about- 25^years.,Occ- Student. ...Respondent^No.6

¶35

All R/O B-4-6811 41 .nl^{Nirqar, Bandlaguda, Chandrayangutta'Hyderabad}

¶36

¶37

Petition under^{Secrion :i20(6)of Cr P C prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in th()^{I,4emorandUm o{ GroundSof Criminat Petition,theHigh Courtmay} be pleased^{For the reasotrs stated rn the accompanyinggroundsto prevent} abuse of court^{anclto secure llre end of iusticeit is prayedthat this Hon'blecourt} O" pt"u."O to^{permrtan(i to (iompound the sectionof law.in view of compromise} b"t*."n the^{parties rn CC No I OOotZOtA, pendingon the files of Hon'ble XV} Addl C.N4.M at^{N/anoranianr;Lrrnplex Hyderabad in the circumstances of the case} and in the^{tnterest of} lustrc

al^nyt'"_

A dvncate IUHU!'l

1 I I

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022

Petitlon under section 320(2) of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in C.C.tto.tOO of 2018 on the fite ot Hon'bte XV Addt C fV.M at Manoranjan complex Hyderabad against the present^petitioners i.e. A.1 to A.5 and be pleaied

¶43

I i I I I i

¶44

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Cflminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MOHD ASIF ALI ,Advocate for the^petitioner in Criminal petition and Respondents No. 2 to 6 in l-A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2oz2 and the Additionar pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 in both criminar petitionand r.A.Nos.2 and3of 2022 and of sri AKSHAT SANGHI, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 in Criminal petition and Petitioner in LA.Nos.2 and 3 o{ ZOZT

¶45

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

I I I

lt i I l I i

I I I I I I I i I l

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶51

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8O74 OF 2022 ALONG WITH I.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2022

¶52

clMr{oN oRpER:

¶53

'l'lris Crirninal P('tition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeliirg Lo .lurrsh thc 1;roceedings in C.C.No. 166 oi 2018 on tl'tc l'ik ol X/ Ad<litionirl Chief Metropolitan Magistratc at, Hr rlt r,rlrad.^'l'he pcritioners herein are accused in the said^casc. 'l'lrc o fcr.rces allt:gccl rrgainst the petitioners herein are under Sc,r'tio i 198 ;.lO(r, ;0aj,lPC and Sec4 & 6 DI) Act.

¶54

llcrrr-cl lcat rtecl cottttsel appearing on both^{sidcs arr<l} lcru nc I Aclclrtronrrl Pr-rblic Prosecutor for the Statc. Perllsed lhc rcc or cl.

¶55

ll. l)Lrlinq lhr' penrk--ncv of the present Crimintrl Pctitiorr,^tl.tc pnrl relr lr:rr c compromised the matter and, accorcliuglr'. re sl)()r-(l( rt \o.2 r1c./ircto complainant filed I.A.Nos.2 ancl 3^ol' 2O-l.l r,, lrcrmit tlrt'rn to compound the offenccs ancl to crrnrlrr rurisr' llle⁽ irse.

¶56

,1. \ rcir: olrler rlaterl 04.O1.2023, this Court, after rccorclittg tlrc s rlrn.rrssiorrs nrirde by the learned coLlnsel for- thc pclilro,r'r-s rrs u cll rs respondent No.2, dircctcd the prrr trcs tr,

¶57

KS,.l cIl.Petition No.aol+ ot ZO22 Along with l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ol ZO22

¶58

appear before the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, for their identification and also directed the Secretary to submit a report by Il.Ol.2023. In compliancc u.ith the said order, the Secretary has submittcd his relrort, on lO.Ol .2023 .

¶59

In the report of the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Sen,iccs Committee, Hyderabad, it is stated that in obed icncc of thc orders dated 04.01.2023, the petitioner I is reprcsented b,r, (iPA I.rolder Sved Sadiq(petitioner-accused No. l), perrtroncrs 2 (o 5 :rnd the 2n,i respondent have appeared before hrrn along \ irh their counsel and on examination and veri[ication ol thcir p:rrtir:ulerrs from their Aadhar Cards, they u,ere ta]liecl. Tltrrs tlre i(ientilication of both the parties has been establishecl.

¶60

(). Thc parties herein have Iiled a joint memo of conlprolnrse st:rting that thcy have agreed among themselves to compl.onlsc :rnd rcsolve all the disputes, they have settled thc disl)utes bct\'ccn thcm amicably and 2"d respondent has no obJcction to <lltash the proceedings against the petitioners herein in thc abor.,c Calendarr Case. The, said joint memo of cornprornisc arrcl tllc rcport of the Secretary are placed on record.

¶61

Crl.Petition No.807a of 2022 Along with l.A.Nor.2 and 3 of 2022

¶62

¶63

In vies of the said rcport o[ the Sccrelir]1 , Tci:rnganrt Higl-r Conrt Lcgal Services Committee, Hvdcrabad itnd also in viel of the co;npromise crttered betu'een the^{petitionersatlcl} rcspondirnt No.2, LA.Nos.2 and 3 t>t 2022 is^allou'ed. Consequently, the Criminal Petitron is ;lllorved^:rtr d^the proccedings in C.C.No.166 of 20 18 on tlre^{filc of XV Adclrtiorral} Chiel Metropolitan l'Tagrstrate at^{Ih'cleral;trd,.Lg:rinstthe} petitioners-Accused Nos. 1 to 5 are herebv^quashed,the petitioners have unclcrtal{en to^p:r'2tI1 ilmotll-lt^{of Rs.1 0,000/} (Rupees Ten Tl-totts:rttcl Onlv) itl lavortr of^{Diret--lor,S:ritlil<} Wcllare, Hyderabacl, (Snvings A/c.No.^{521aa926279,Slittc} Banl< o[ lndia, Sl-rantirlagar^{Brant'tt &2O070. IFSC Corle:} SBlNOO2007O, MICR No. 50000'+057),^{rvithirra periorlof one} u'eek fi'orn today, arrtl filc proof ol th( s:Illlc^{irlto tlre [lt gistrr} '

¶64

As a sequcl, 1he mtsccllancous Pcli[ior)s,^{petlclrrrg if alrv,} shall stand closed.

¶65

^3g#RIiJ:uili.^* /rrRuE^coPY// GD

¶66

SECTION^OFFICER

¶67

Nletropolitan^{Nlagistrate at Manoranlan co plex}

¶68

To'

¶69

t li?IJ#tttS'slfli:-""' women Porice statron south Zone Hvderabad 2.^{The station House ol{iLer' vvu!'rui'} Dislrict Prosecutor'^HrghcoLlrl _ .A t^.the^{{or the} srarn^{or Tclengand}

¶70

. :ffi;:;f,[c.ifi"

¶71

^^{one CC to SRIMOHD ASIF ALl Advocate IOPUCj}

¶72

One CC to SRl. AKSHAT^{SANGHI, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶73

Two CD Copies

¶74

Kam A_

¶75

(Along with a Copy of Memo of Compromise)

¶76

Note: Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees^{Ten thousandonly} )^{has been paidby} Sri MOHD ASIF ALl, Counsel^{for the Petitionerasdirectedbythe Hon'ble Court} order dated:16-02-2023 lo the^{" Director, Sarnk WelfareHyderabad} ,^{and filed} Memo vide^proof of compliance^{USR No.4139'll2O23ot daled.21-04-2023}

HIGH COURT

KS,J

DATED:16/0212023

f. 141 ,3: iJ
Nl <br>l)l' ': $5 \!'l
' ,:
.'t.\. /.,
22<br>

¶81

ORDER

¶82

CRLP.No.8074 o12022 ALONG WITH l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of²⁰

¶83

THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS ALLOWED

¶84

Syed Akram Ahmed v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Akram Ahmed v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Suri Vs M.v.v.PrasadaRao

M/s. Vemula Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

Sujatha Annangi Vs The State of Telangana and another

Raghupathi Aakuthota Vs The State of Telangana

Sunkari Kistamma Vs The State of Telangana

Sunil P. Shinde Vs The State of Telangana and another