Allowed

Sujatha Annangi v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC15 Feb 2023CRLP/11006/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner in C.C. No. 498 of 2021 based on arguments and reasons similar to those accepted in a prior batch of petitions heard on 07.02.2023. The petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C was accordingly allowed.

What did the court decide?

Procedings against the petitioner in C.C. No. 498 of 2021 quashed; Criminal Petition allowed; pending miscellaneous applications crossed.

Sujatha Annangi Vs The State of Telangana and another — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s1 I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO

¶3

WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11006 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sujatha Annangi, Wo. Venkata Ramesh Annangi, Aged Malor, Occ Director of Sri Savitr Solar Private Limited, Registered Office. Survey No. 374, Plot No. 34/1, CIE Gandhi Nagar, Phase- ll, Hyderabad - 500037.

¶9

...PETITIONER/A3

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶12

Lords Freight (lndia) Pvt. Ltd., A company incorporated under the companies Act, With its Regd Office at 511, sth Floor, Crescent Business Park, Samitha Complex, Sakinaka Telephone Exchange, Safed Pull, Sakinaka, Mumbai - 400072 And rep by Satrajit Das, General Manager- South ll

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings CC 49812021 on the file XI Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad

¶15

1.A. NO: 2OF 2022

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings CC No. 498 of 2021 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N KRISHNA SUMANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Hirendranath Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

t ,

¶19

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SUR:ENDER

¶20

CR: MINAL PETITION No.11OO6 of 121t22!,

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

\ \

¶23

i. This Crirninal Petition is f,rled to quash tir: prroceedings against the pe titioner/A3 in C.C.No.498 of 2O2 L or: the hle XI Additional Ch: r:l' Metropolitan Magistrate at Sec lL trde:rabad. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitionet'. wtro submits that this Cc urt, in similar circumstances, quashed the proceedings z gair-rst the petitioner/A.3 in Crirnina-1 Petition Nos.1O97B o. 2022 & batch on 07.O2.2(t):,3. The said submission o the learned counsel for the p:t Ltic,ner is not disputed by tt e learned Additional Public Prosecr.rtor.

¶24

In view < f th.e submission of the learned <:,:rurrsel for the petitioner anc for the reasons alike in the (l<:,mrnon Order dated 07.02 .2)'23 in Criminal Petition Nos. 109|'8 of 2022 & batch, this Cr.mina,1 Petition is a-lso tiable to be ei.lovred

¶25

In the rrsult, the proceedings against the petitioner/A3 in C.C.No.49.i c,f 2O2l on the h1e XI Arlcitional Chief

¶26

are hereby

¶27

Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad,

¶28

quashed.

¶29

Accordingly, ttre Criminal petition is allowed.

¶30

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, sharl stand crosed.

¶31

SD/. A.V.S PRASAD AssrsrANr REGT/^R

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 The Xl Additional chief Metropolitan^{Magistrateat Secunderabad} 2 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor,^{High Court for the Stateof Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶36

3 Ohe CC to SRl. N KRISHNA^{SUMANTHAdvocate} [OPUC] 4 One CC to SRI Hirendranath Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CD Copies

$.J).

HIGH COUIIT

DATED:1 511212023

'
,..,'1.. ' .
<br>i 15 it:L,r :

¶42

ORDER

¶43

CRLP.No.1'1006 of 2022

¶44

ALLOWING OF THE CRLP

Sujatha Annangi v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujatha Annangi v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Indrasena Chowdary Vs The State of Telangana

Pannala Poolamma Vs The State of Telangana

N.Madhavi Vs The State of Telangana

Ravi Suri Vs M.v.v.PrasadaRao

M/s. Vemula Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

Panjala Raju Goud and another Vs The State of Telangana and another