Allowed

Sunil P. Shinde v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC16 Feb 2023CRLP/1222/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed a quash petition filed under Sections 320(2) and 320(8) of Cr.P.C. and compounding under Section 320, following verification by the Legal Services Committee and a joint compromise memo, quashing proceedings in C.C. No. 354 of 2017 related to IPC 498-A.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in C.C. No. 354 of 2017 quashed; accused directed to pay ₹10,000 to Sainik Welfare Fund within one week.

Sunil P. Shinde Vs The State of Telangana and another — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s1 ]

¶2

IN THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NOi 1222OF 2023 ALONG WITH l.A.NOs.4 AND 5 OF 2023

¶6

Between:

¶7

Sunil P. Shinde, S/o. parushuram Shende, aged 47 years Occ. Business, Rl/o. Sejal Tower, 2nd Floor Room no. 2404, Best Colony Road, Best Nagar (West), goregaon, Mumbai 500^'104

¶8

Parushuram Shende, S/o. yellapa, aged 70 years, occ Business Fl/o. Sejal Tower, 2nd Floor Room no.2404, Best Colony Road, Best Nagar (West), goregaon, Mumbai 500 104

¶9

...PETITIONERs/ACCUSED No. 1 & 2

¶10

AND

¶11

¶12

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana

¶13

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶14

Smt. Kavitha Sunil Shinde, Wo. Sunil P. Shinde, aged 42^years, Occ. House wife, Rl/o. H no.16-2-6741511 F-301 , Rukmini Residency, Judges Colony Malakpet, Hyderabad

¶15

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANTS

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,^{the High Court may} be pleased to QUASH the^proceedings in C.C. No. 354 o't^{2017 on the file of} court of the Hon'ble Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan^{Magistrateat Nampally,} Hyderabad

¶17

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2023

¶18

Petition under S ection 482 of cr.p.c praying that in flre circumstances stated in the lvlemor rnlum of Grounds of criminal petition, h:r H gh court may be pleased to disper-se with the filing of the certified copy of th,: C.C. No. 354 of 2017 on the tile c' court of the Hon'ble Xlll Additional (l hiet Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampa ly Hyderabad

¶19

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2023

¶20

Petition unde^- Section 482 of Cr.p .C praying that in .l.re r;ircumstances stated in the [,4emori nrium of Grounds of criminal petition, tht, High court may be pleased to STAY rll further proceedings in c.c. No. 3s4 o 1ro1 | on the file of court of the Hon'ble Xlll Additional chief Metropolitan Magi ;:i ate at Nampally, Hyderabad, pending r lisposal of the above criminal petition

¶21

l.A. NO: 5 OF 2023

¶22

Petition under l€ction 320 (2) of cr.p.c praying that in :he crircumstances stated in the Memor., nrlum of Grounds of criminal petition, t re, High court n$y be pleased to record ht: compromise and quash the proceedi.gr; in C.C. No.354 of 2017 on the file ,rf court of the Hon'ble Xlll Additional ohief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampal y, Hyderabad

¶23

LA. NO: 4OF 2023

¶24

Between:

¶25

Smt. Kavitha S. ni Shinde, W/o. Sunil^p. Shinde, aged 42,7r:ar:;, Occ. House wife, R/o. H n >.'16-2-6741511 F-301 , Rukmini Rdsiden<:ri JuOges Cofony Malakpet, Hyde r atrad

¶26

...PETtTtONEtURESp No. 2

¶27

AND

¶28

1 Prlil t^{Shinde,S/o. parushuram Shende,aged 4Z years ()r:c.Eiusiness, Rl/o,} sejar rower, 2r d Froor R99I f,o 2404, Best Colony F!:rad Best Nagar (West), goregao r, Mumbai 500 104

¶29

2 Parushuram Sl'r :nle, S/o. yellapa, aged 70 years, occ E Lr,;iness Rl/o. Seial Tower, 2nd Flcrrr Room n6. Z4Oq, Blest Col6ny noaO, Ei:,;i tLgriiW"ltl, goregaon, Muml ai 500 104

¶30

The State of Telangana,^Rep by^{its Public Prosecutor'High Court at} Hyderabad for the State^{of Telangana}

¶31

...RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED NO¹ &²

¶32

Petition under Section 320^{(6) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the l/emorandum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Court may} be pleased to^{grant permission to file the present criminal petition along with} compromise seeking to^{quashthe proceedingsin C.C. No. 354 of 2017 on the} file of court of the Hon'ble Xlll^{Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at} Nampally, Hyderabad

¶33

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, upon perusingthe lvlemorandumof} Grounds of Criminal Petition^{and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri K. S.} suNEEL, Advocate for the^{Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the} Respondent No. 1 and of Sri^{K. RAKESHKUtvlAR,Advocate for the Respondent} No.2.

¶34

The Court made the following:^{COMMON ORDER}

¶35

¶36

THE H,)NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SUTIENDIER

¶37

CI! IMINAL PETITION No.l222 OF 2Oi:3 AI.ONG WITH LA.Nos.4 AND 5 OF 2oil3

¶38

COMMON OTIDER:

¶39

This Crr n nal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to qui s^-r the proceedings in C-C.No.354 cl 2Cl7 on t!;re file of XIII A dditional Chief Metropolitan ll agistrate at Nampally, Hyr e:abad. The petitioners hereirr are zr,.:cused in the said cas€. T[ e offences alleged against the peti1.: ont:rs herein are under Secr ic,n 498-A of IPC.

¶40

Hea.rd ::arned counsel appearing on brtl.r s;ides ald learned l.dditi rrLai Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused thd' record.

¶41

During : 1(, pendency of the present Crimin ll Petition, the parties have r:ompromised the matter alrd accordingly, respondent Nr .!l-cJe facto cornplainant hled I.A.llo s.4 and 5 of 2023 to pennit them to compound the offr:rrcesr and to compromise t! e case.

¶42

Vide orcl rr dated 07.O2.2O23, this Court, it.::er recording the submiss | )r s made by the learned cou 1l:sel for the petitioners as ^,e11 as reglondent No.2, directed t.l re parties to

¶43

.-.f

¶44

(s,J Crl.Petition No.1222 of²⁰²³ Alon8 with l.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2023

¶45

¶46

appear before the Secretar5r, Telangana^{High CourtLegal} Services Committee, Hyderabad,^{for their identification and also} directed the Secretary to submit^{a report by 16 .O2.2O23.In} compliance with the said order,^{the Secretar5rhas submitted his} report, on 14.O2.2O23.

¶47

In the report of the Secretary,^{Telangana High Court Legal} Services Committee, Hyderabad, it^{is statedthat in obedience of} the orders dated 07.O2.2023, the^{petitionersand the 2.'d} respondent have appeared^{beforehim along with their counsel} and on examination and verification^{of their particularsfrom} their Aadhar Cards, they^{were tallied. Thus the identification of} both the parties has been established.

¶48

The parties herein have filed^{a joint memo of compromise} stating that they have agreed^{among themselves to compromise} and resolve all the disputes,^{they have settled the disputes} between them amicably and 2'd^{respondent has no objectionto} quash the proceedings against the^{petitioners herein in the} above Calendar Case.^{The said joint memo of compromise and} the report of the Secretary^{are placed on record.}

¶49

KS,J Crl-Peti:io i No.1222 of 2023 AlonE with l./,llos.4 and 5 of 2023

¶50

¶51

7 . In vieur c. t:le said report of the Secretary,^'1ir]i Lngana High Court Legal Se'vices Committee, Hyderabad and ir r,io in vieu, of the compronr is: entered between the petil onr:rs and responder t Ir r.12, I.A.Nos.4 arrd 5 of 20'23 is allowed. Consequentl_rz, the Criminal Petition is allor.r erl and the proceedings in C,C.No.354 of 2Ol7 on the file of )l''l Additional Chief MetropoJ. tan Magistrate at Nampally, FIycleral.rad, against the petitioners A:cused Nos.1 and 2 are herebl, <1-rashed, the petitioners har, : undertaken to pay arr amount ,:^- I?s. 10,000/(Rupees^{'I'en ''housand} Only) in favour o[ Drre r tor, Sainik Welfare, I{yder abad, (Savings A/c.No. 5218891t6279, State Bark of tndia Shantinagar Branch & 2(tO7O, IFSC Code: SBINOO2O070, MICR No. 500OO4057), within a pe,rio,I of one week from tod;L r, and file proof of the same into the t{egistry.

¶52

As a seq. el, the miscellaneous Petitions, perrrling if any, shall stancl clor: ec[.

¶53

Sd/. N CHANDR,I\ SEKHAR dAO ASSISlAI{T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// {\l

¶54

To,

¶55

S,:CTION OFFTCER

¶56

The Xlll Additior rl ,lhief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampal ), Hylerabad

¶57

The Statiorr Hou: e Cfficer, Women police Station, CCS, Hyie:rabad 3 Two ccs t. the r: ul)ric prosecutor, High court for the .State rrr '[ererngana at Hyderabad [OUl ]

¶58

One CC to SRt. (. S. SUNEEL, Advocate tOpUCl

-r-

One CC to SRl. K. RAKESH KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl 6. Two CD Copies t (Along with a copy of Joint Memo)

¶64

I:1"^:ll":"^{p-aid by K.S. SUNEEL,} Counset for rhe ,'^:.ff ::[h^{j,lf ,#;, j]qqesrenror.isalr-o;d;:.:T,?iilL"r13.il",fl} :ff ".1 ;-,m;m:ruii[,tfi .,, {:"},sf, f}1.';l,trig;jilil"JftT

¶65

¶66

I .1

¶67

HIGH COI.'RT' DATED: 1610ra12023

¶68

¶69

COMMON OFIDER

¶70

CRLP.No.122',2 ot 2023 ALONG V\IITH IA.NO.4 AND r OF 2023

¶71

.
ij. i ,:
i,, '<br>:.' J.
1s11 .-. r,iI tl
i: /i
I u lnt$
.'. i"/
: '1". {'
:.-..J i.ri .ti::.' ;-
... -:a:.- :r-;-

¶72

ALLOWING T {E CRIMINAL

PETITION

@
{ 0
v,1\w

{t<rt-

MEMORANDUM OF CRL.P.I{.P. F'ILED U/S^{320(8) OF CR.P.C)} HIGH COURT OF }UDICZ\TURE AT :: HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANCANA

¶77

r.A. No. I OF 2022 IN Crl.P.No. 1eJ2 oY2ory

¶78

Between:

¶79

Sunil P. Shinde S/o. parushuram Shende, aged 47 yeas Occ. Business, It/o. Sejal Tower, 2"d Floor Room no. 2404, Best Colony Roa4 Best Nagar (West), goregaory Mumbai 500 104

¶80

Parushuram Shende, S/o. yellapa, aged 70 years, occ Business I{,/o. Sejal Tower, 2nd Floor Room no. 2404, Best Colony Road, Best Nagar (West), goregaon, Mumbai 500¹⁰⁴

¶81

.. Petitioners/Accused No.¹ &² AND 16'.1

¶82

The State of Telangana Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for the state of relangana

¶83

... Respondent/Respondent

¶84

Smt. Kavitha Sunil Shinde 2) V!/o. SAunil P. Shinde, aged 42years, Occ. House wife, f(o. H no. 16-2-674/5fl F-301, Rukmini Residency, ]udges Colony Malakpet, Hyderabad

¶85

¶86

... Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶87

IOINTMEMO

¶88

It is submitted that the Petitioners^{herein filed the above} Quash Petition seeking to quash the proceedings^{in C.C.No. 354 ol 2017on the file} of court of the Hon'ble XIII Additional^{Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at} Nampally, Hyderabad, registered for^{the offenceU/s. 498-4 IPC. The} Respondent No. 2/defacto complainant^{has lodged the abovecase against the} Petitioners/accused no. 1 &^2. noP l

It is srrbnr tt:d that at trre instance of erders a.d r,r,e II.wisrhers, the 'oth parties .or,e fr, w ard to settle the matter amicably b.r ent:ring into an Memorand Lrm ,f Understanding dated 2g.72.2022 ;r ntl the defacto complainant is nr t traving any objectiorl to quash thr: proc:e Jin.3s in C.C. No. 354 of 2011' on h,r file of court of the Hon,blt: Xlll,ltdclitional Chief Metropolitan M; gistlate at Nampallv, Hyderabacl perr,J ing against the Petitionersy'\ccur, d Iurlher a ininr ,r.;r-..:r _j defacto comprairr rnr is,::^"#;t ;::":;l ::T"rl,: : T::::,,::,T: Hon'ble Court.

¶93

It is therefc: e Prayed that the H,n'ble.Court may be,.leased to record compromise and l. u.rsh the C.C. No. 354 of 2017 on the fi[,: of coutt of the Hon'b]e XII t Ac lirional Chief Metropolitan M; Hyderabad and p:ss such other ordeq,/ 614"". "";t"'T:';,,rr: #':; deems fit and propt r ; n the interest of Irrstice.

¶94

Hyderabad, Date - 23.72.2022

¶95

Counsel for pe t'I tiont rs ln-^/' )--p*' Counsel for Responc ,nt No.2

¶96

<- ( Srr nit P. Shi nde) C'r 'i'"r ,zu i

¶97

(Parur hrrrlrn Shende) , ,' n t'| a 4^',,ryi,-*

¶98

(Smt. Kavith,r l;unrl Shinde)

Sunil P. Shinde v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil P. Shinde v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Suri Vs M.v.v.PrasadaRao

M/s. Vemula Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

Sujatha Annangi Vs The State of Telangana and another

Syed Akram Ahmed Vs the State of Telangana

Raghupathi Aakuthota Vs The State of Telangana

Sunkari Kistamma Vs The State of Telangana