Dismissed

Abdul Mujahad v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Feb 2023CRLP/7937/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed two Criminal Petitions under Section 492 Cr.P.C. filed by Abdul Mujahad seeking quashing and stay of proceedings in C.C. No.9513 of 2019. The court held the petitions were infructuous as the petitioner admitted guilt and was sentenced to a fine in the lower court.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petitions No. 7937 of 2019 and IA No. 2 of 2019 were dismissed as the petitioner admitted guilt and was sentenced to a fine in the lower court.

Abdul Mujahad Vs State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^320e I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE CHTLLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶5

Between:

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO :7937 OF 2019

¶7

Abdul Mujahad, S/o Ghouse Mohinuddin (Actual name Abdul Haseeb S/o Gulam Ghouse Mohiuddin) Aoed about.57 vJr*) ijii_'e.;iinu.. Rl/o H.No.16_2-B4Ot1t3, Ameen Colony Saidabid, Hyderabad

¶8

...PETtTtONERyAccusED NO.1 AND

¶9

State of Telangana, Rep. by public prosecutor High Court of Telangana Hyderabad

¶10

......Respondent No.1/ Complainant

¶11

Mohammed Fazullah, S/o Not known to the petitioner A 9gd^{tt ajor occ-Business^R/oH.No16-1-t+lr,'i;rirooi,} Opp_ Vlp Schoot, Next to Libas Showroom Dr. Zakir Hussain Coiony, SaiOaObb Hvoeia-t "^{(i '} ....Respondent No.1/ Defacto Complainant

¶12

!v.qd [!qrra!h ali, S/o Syed Bq.qqt Aged about 36 years, Occ_ Business Fl/o H.No.23-2-192, Moghatiura, Hari Bow-ti Croii fioaO, HyOi:raOlO^-- ...RESPONDENT NO.3/ACCUSED NO.2

¶13

Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal-peiition, the Higha;;;;;;;e pleased to Quash the c.c. bearing No.9513 of 2019 on the fire 6r ut eooiti6nat chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioner/Accu."J lio-. i.^-

¶14

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2019

¶15

Petition under section 492 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or criminaipJtition,the High c;;;;;y1. gfgageo to stay ail further proceedings in c.c. No.9513 of 2o,rg 6n tne tte oitne Vll.Additioral chief Metroporitan Magistrate, Hyderabad incruding *t" ,pp"ri"""" of the Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing" the ,rgrr"rG of STi.P.PANDURANGA RAo, Advocate for the petitioner ind of sri keerthi Kiran ]!uaar,^{representing sri K.Arun Kumar, Advocatefor} the Responoent ruo.z anJ or the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

HON B LE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA RIM LPETITIONNo.7937 of ,201 9

¶19

QEDER: I. Seeki r,9 the Ccurt to quash the procet ri, ngs that are pending ag{ iLst the lretitioner in C.C.No.95l3 rtl 2019,on the file of the ,lourt of Wi Additional Chief Metropolital Magistrate, I tyde,raba<l, the present Crimin.rl perit. on is filed 2 No repr -.sentation on petitioner,s sicie .tn cz II

¶20

On the rther liand, th e learned Addiriona, public ProsecUtor, rlt writtr:n lnstructions. sL, brnit s that the petitioner adn il:.e<l the gurlt and he u,as sent ence i to 1:ay fine artd thus, the , )rtmrnal I)etition has become urfruc _r_Lours. 4. Recordinl the said submission, the Crirlina .[)et: tion is dismissed.

¶21

Miscellane xrs petitions pending, i1 any, sli:rll stand closed.

¶22

¶23

n s s r s rff 1: k{:', 6if;^'E /t-fRUE COPYil

LJ SECIION OFFICER

'l . The Vll Additional C rief ltilglropol;tan Magistrate, Hyderatrad. 3 ?'x3S3J?"tlJJ# l'l?19'*:"' lev"':i; roiu6) HyoeraoaJriJJ^' )--^{L r{)secutor' High courtfor the stale of} r:l:rng,rna at 3. ?,13 33 3;'':f"b'r i r"'iran Kunrar, Advocate [opuc]

${-

HIGH COURT

OATED:1610212023

,-o .1 lrt l; TA f A.
(" 't
i 'l { nAR 20n ],
I
?:, -i. ./
,:/
. i)1;5..,,1,'::.: --
i.-..;.:;e--:.::--i:'^

¶32

ORDER

¶33

CRLP.No.7937 of 2(^'19

¶34

DISMISSING THE CI I-,P.

¶35

1)
q
-u

Abdul Mujahad v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Mujahad v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narla Malsoor Vs The State of Telangana

Kallu Surendar Vs the State of Telangana

T.Baswaraj Vs The State of Telangana

P. Srinivas Reddy Vs N.Srinivas

Garikapati Venkata Satyanarayana Vs State of Telangana

Shaik Khaleel Vs The State of Telangana