High Court dismissed Criminal Petition No. 6688 of 2018 seeking quashal of FIR No. 195 of 2018 after the Additional Public Prosecutor submitted the case was civil in nature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[320e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6688 OF 2018
Between:
...PETITIONERYACCUSED Nos't to 3
AND
...2Nd RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petitlon under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records relating to and pertaining to FlR.No.195 of 20'18 dated 14-6-2018 on the file of Khanapuram (H) Police Station, Khammam, Khammam District and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and unjust by allowing the criminal petition as prayed.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, he High Court may bepleased togrant stay of all furtherproceedings including arrest ofthe petitioners in connection with FlR.No.195 of 2018 dated 14-06-2018 on the file of Khanapuram (H) Police Station, Khammam, Khammam Districtpending disposal of the above criminalpetition.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr,P-C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order dt: 2810612018passed in CrlP No.6688/2018 until further orders,pending disposal of Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri VBRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Pulla Rao Yellanki, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following:
HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.6688 of 20l8
ORDER:
Sd/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// L,4 SECTION OFFICER
To,
DL Pl^s.
HIGH COURT
Dr. CSL,J
DAf ED:1510212023
ORDER
CRLP.No.6688 of 2018
1 HE STA I.t
(
)-'
(.'
a) il
L) 10ll R ?t}:l
il
\o,,
,,./
DISTVIISSING THE CRIIVIINAL PETITION
@P*o^ .12>z'
Narla Malsoor
Narla Sujatha
Mikkilineni Nagaraju
Nunna Chandram
Suryadevara Bharadvaja
Peruboina Veeraswamy
Sumalatha Chillakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
