Petitioner filed a criminal petition to quash orders confirming conviction but counsel submitted the case was withdrawn, rendering the petition infructuous. Court dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed; miscellaneous petitionsif any, closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[320s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 899 OF 2019
Between:
Garikapati Venkata Satyanarayana, S/o. late Narayana Swamy, Aged about 45 Years, Occ - Business, R/o. H.No. 9-5-9, Kasba Bazar, Khammam Town and District
.PETITIONER/PETITIONERY APPELLANT/ACCUSED
AND
...RES,.NDENTS/ RES'.NDENTS/ RESPONDENT /COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the Order Dt. 1810712018 passed in Crl.R.P.No.21 of 2018 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Khammam confirming the order dated 2410112018 passed in Crl.lt/P No.572 ot 2017 in CC No.305/2015 on the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam.
I.A. NO:2OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in C.C No. 305 of 2015 on the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam including appearance of the petitioner
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of STi.P.VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M.K.Raj Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.899 of 2Ol9
ORDER:
1 . Seeking the Court toquash the order dated 18.O7.2018 in Crl.R.P.No.21 of 2018, passed by the Court of Prl.Sessions Judge, Khammam by confirming the order dated 24.01.2018 in CrI.M.P.No.572 of 2A17 in C.C.No.3O5 of 2015, on the file of the Court of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam, the present Criminai Petition is flled.
4 . Miscellareous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
ANAULLAHANSARI Sd/.MOHD.S ASSI biAxr arctsrann /ITRUECOPY'
SECTIONOFFICER
To
i?l:#l'l$Fx*3,Tffir#iq!J#i?.'?JP"',',:::,,"ansanaa'l "' H"Ji"ii"uJtburl
S. TwoCD CoPies
I
HIGH COURT
DAfED:1610212023
ORDER
IHE S T4 14.
q
I
3 24 t{An?U23
n55Py, r '.;'r
CRLP.No.899 ot 20'19
CRL.P. IS DISMISSED-
>
$
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the impugned orders given that the case was withdrawn before the trial court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Garikapati Venkata Satyanarayana
State of Telangana
Rayala Koteswara Rao
Chillakur Sumalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
