The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to set aside an interim maintenance order. It held the petition infructuous as the matter is covered by a prior order on revision maintainability.
The criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32es ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5769 OF 2015
Between:
Dr.Mohd.lmtiaz Malik, S/o. late Dr. Malik Ghulam lbrahim Sharif, Aged46 years, Occ: Dentist, R/o.G-03, A1 Mamoor, 3rd Cross Benson, Bangalore, Karnataka
...PETITIONERYRESPONDENTS
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the order daied 1511012014 in Crl.M.P No 10212014in MC-No.10/2014 on the file of Addl MSJ for the Trail of JHCBBC cum Addl Family Court Cum XXlll Addl Chief Judge, Hyderabad.
CRLPMP. NO: 12866 OF 2015
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant extension of stay beyond 04-11-2O15 of further proceedings in M.C.No. 10 ol 2014 on the file of the Addl Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of JHCBBC cum Addl. Family Court cum XXlll Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad.
CRLPMP. NO: 5751 OF 2015
Petrtior und,r Sectron 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that irth3 circumstances stated in the lVlenrtra ndum of Grounds of Crrminal Fetitiorr:he HighCourt may be pleased tc r;ran interim suspension of the order<latecl 1!:11A12014 in Crl.M.P No 102 of 2Ct14 ir 14 C No 10 oI 2014 on the file :fAdrll VISJ for the trial of JHCBBC-CUIV-AdJl Family Court- Cum XXlll Adl. Chief Jrt.geHyderabad.
CRLPMP. NO: 1331 4 OF 2015
Between:
Akberunnisa 3egr-rm, Wo. Dr. Mohd lmtiaz Malik.age,J al>ou.39years,Occ: House \Alife f /c Flat No. 64/4 6th Floor Sky Lark Apartmr:nts;,Basheer Bagh Hyderabac
PETITIONEFYRES PONDENTNO.1
AND
RESPOl..I bENTS/PETITIONER
...RESPONDENITFTES PONDENT NO.2
Petitior und,r Section 482 of Cr.P Cpraying thal irr th,l circumstances stated rn the Mem(:andum of Grounds of Criminal Petttior,he HighCourt may be pleased to va{la -. the inter m staygranted in Crl.PNo. €il'6'l/2()15 dt.02-07-15.
CRLPMP. NO: 908{ C'F 2015
Petition und r Section 482 of Cr P.Cpraying that irr th,l circumstances stated in the I\4ern( randum of Grounds of Criminal Petitior ,rhe HighCourt may be pleased to grran e xtension of stay beyond 06.08.:1015of furtherproceedings in MC No 10/2014, n the file of the Addl MSJ for the Trialr:f JH(IBBCcumAddl Family court crm().lll Addl. Chref Judge, Hyderabad lcr the offencesunder Section 34(a) IL1 )f AP Excise Act until further orders.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Craminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C [IR VELU, Advocate for the Petitioner being not present and the Assistant Publrc Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri RAJENDER REDDY, Advocate for the Respondent No.1
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE H )N'BLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VEIiIUGoPAL
CRI MINAL PETITION No.5769 OF 2015
ORDER:
The pres,:rrt Criminal Petilion is filed seel,.ir.,g'_o set aside the orde:' ,la:ed 15.1O.2014 in Crl.M.P.No. Lr)1, of 2014 in M.C.No.10 of 2014 on tl.re file of the leie'ned Additional Metropolit eLn )( sslons Judge lor the triril of ,IHTIBBC-cumAdditiona Fa rnill' Court-cum XXIII Addirion:a. Chief Judge, Hyderabarl
2
five weeks. The same was extended till 07.10.2015. This Court vide order dated 27.O4.2O22 in Crl.R.C (SR) No.319g of 2022 held. that as against an interlocutory order, a Revision under Section 397 of Criminal procedure Code is not maintainable.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR qD
//TRUE COPYII
To,
SECTION OFFICER
pr \ -
HIGH COUR''
DATED: 191C612023
--J''
/7l- <,t.:' ,4 i{:
,',
! 1 AUB 2$u3
)
ORDER
CRLP.No.57;9 of 2015
DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION
AS INFRUCI C)US
).---'
€)y
I
i6,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can entertain a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC to set aside an interim maintenance order passed by the lower court.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr.Mohd.lmtiaz Malik
Akberunnisa Begum
State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
