Dismissed

Mohammed Nawaz Ali Khan v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Mar 2023CRLP/7405/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed the criminal petition as infructuous, noting that a charge sheet had been filed under Cr.P.C. Section 482. However, the court directed petitioners to move for quashing of the charge sheet as a subsequent measure.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous without costs; petitioners directed to move for quashment of the charge sheet.

Mohammed Nawaz Ali Khan Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7405 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 . Mohammed Nawaz Ali Khan, S/o. Ahmed Ali Khan, aged 37 years, Occ.Working in abroad, Cast. Muslim. GPA Holder Ahmed-Ali Khan, S/o. Late. Md. lbrahim Ali Khan.

¶9

Fatima Khatoon, W/o. Ahmed Ali Khan, aged 57 Years, Occ. House wife, Cast Muslim.

¶10

Mohammed Ahmed Ali Khan, S/o. Late. Md_ lbrahim All Khan, aged 62 years, Occ. Car Driver, Cast Muslim. CPA Holder for Mohammed Nawaz Ali Khan, S/o. Md. Ahmed Ali Khan.

¶11

Mohammed lmran Ali Khan, S/o. Ahmed Ali Khan, aged 34years, Occ. Real Estate, Caste. Muslim (All are R/o. H.No. 18-12-4191C135O3, Baba Nagar, (Kanchanbagh) Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad, Telangana State)

¶12

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.'lto4

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court At Hyderabad.

¶15

thameem^{Banu, Wo. Mohammed NawazAli Khan,} Age. 37^years, Occ. !-l_ouggwj[e,^{cast.Mustim,Rl/o. H.No. 1-6-791, Zamisiha"npur,} ltear eK Uinar Masiid, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. Telangana State.

¶16

3 Sub-lnspector of Police, Police Station, WpS, CCS, DD, Hyderabad.

¶17

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT

¶18

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in FrR No.s24 oi 2021,Police Station WPS CCS,DD,Hyderabad, under sections 49g _ A 3 and 4 DP Act on the file of the court of the Honourable Xlll Addl chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally Hyderabad l.A o:1OF 2021

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in lhe circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition,the High court may be pleased to\dispense with filing of certified copy of the FrR No. 52 4 ot 2021, Police Station WPS, CCS, DD, Hyderabad, Undei section 498_4 tpC, 3 and i DP- Act, on the file of rhe Hon'bre xIr ADDL. chief IVetroporitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice

¶20

¶21

l.A. NO: 2 OF 20 21

¶22

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the I.4emorandum of Grounds of criminal petition,the High court may be pleased to grant Stay of a[ further proceedings in FIR No. 524 oi zozl , poric; Station: WPS, CCS, DD, Hyderabad, Under seciion 498-A 1pC, 3 and 4 Dp. Act, on the file of rhe Hon'bte xllt ADDL. chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampa y, Hyderabad

¶23

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri tr/ D FASIUDDIN, Advocate for the Petitioner and the public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No. 2&3

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶26

CRIMI^{NAL PETITION No.7405 oF 202L}

¶27

OR DER:

¶28

Learned^{Additional PublicProsecutor submits that after} completion^{of investiga'lionin thc prcscnl crime'[he Police filed} charge^{sheet beforethe concernedCourt and C'C No'9363 12022} was assigned,^{and as such the cause in this CriminalPetition} does not^{survive for adjudicalionand the same hasbecome} infructuous.

¶29

Recording^{the aforesaid submission'the CriminalPetitron} is dismissecl^{as infruc[uous'However'the petilioners/A1 to A4} a.re at^{liberty Lo movc this Court scekingquashment of the} proceedings^{of the chargesheet'}

¶30

Miscellaneous^{PetiLions, pendingif any' shall stand closed'}

¶31

SD/.C. PRAVEEN^KUMAR ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

l.TheCourtoftheXlllAddl.ChiefMetropolitanMagistrateatNampally, Hvderabad

¶36

2 iru S;tt.^{Houseofficer' PS, WPS-DD Hvderabad}

¶37

+;;bc; b^{p-uotL pioseiutor,Hishcourt foi the state of relansana'at} 4 HvderabadlOUTl^{'d;ccGsRl: MD FASIUDDIN, Advocate[oPUC]}

¶38

Two^{CD coPies}

¶39

¶40

P6"r(

¶41

I I I i l 1 I i I I I i I I i I I i l I :

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 610312023

ORDER

CRLP.No.7405 of 2021

S i.a r,:
/..)
;C) -t.. i
1,.,lv [ 1 illlY 2$U] .'
.i
,,./
,t'/'

¶47

DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶48

Pd"^. q,

¶49

rsM,-g

Mohammed Nawaz Ali Khan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Nawaz Ali Khan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Farooq Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. P. Vijaya Vs The State of Telangana and another

Nageswar Rao.K Vs State of Telangana and another

Smt. Ameena Unnisa,and 8 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Guntakanti Venkatarameshwar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

S.Nagaraju Gupta Vs The State of Telangana