The High Court dismissed the criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC as the counsel on record was no longer serving and no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I i
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 212 0F 2020
Between:
Nageswar Rao.K, S/o Appa Rao, Ryo H No. 8-15-4 B RVRS Surya Apartments. Voleti Vari Street, Gandhi Nagar, Kakinada.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under section 482 o't cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in c.c.No. g5 of 2019, on the fire of r[ Special magistrate, at Erramanzil, Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of tne d.c.tto. a5 or 2019, on the file of lll Special magistrate, at Erramanzil, HyOerabad.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in c.c.No. g5 of 20'19, o; the file of lll special magistrate, at Erramanzir, Hyderabad, incruding the appearance of the petitioner/accused, pending disposal of the euash petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the ltrlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. P.R.BALARAMI REDDY, (Not present) Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.212 OF2O2O
ORDER:
The present petition is filed in the year 2020 and no
interim orders were granted by this Court till date. It is
informed to this Court that the counsel on record is no more.
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
In view of the above, the criminal petition is dismissed.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court,
in the event of any cause survives. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, If any,
pending shall stand closed
Sd/- G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
NJB
VH
?ntC.,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1510312023
ORDER
E S I-ATE o
$ 1 ti',N ?$8
O)
*
at-
CRLP.No.212 of 2020
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION.
?tt 4,
">>
<br>\q <br>
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nageswar Rao.K
State of Telangana
K. Surennder
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
