Dismissed

Chintala Rajeshwari v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC2 Mar 2023CRLP/7230/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash proceedings invoked in an FIR. Holding that charges were laid post-investigation, the Court declared the petition infructuous but allowed separate quashment of the charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty to approach Court for quashment of charge sheet separately.

Chintala Rajeshwari Vs State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32sl ]

¶2

!N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETIT!ON NO: 7230 oF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

FIi:':#",:yft urban, Khammam District^{#i:,J,,iexf s:llx?..:#.[??*fi} ,E,il",tffi H#:;

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 1 2

¶11

'iiiii""H{JlB?iif I elagnana eli,,,?,8[?.Ttr6fl HiLl?,,T.'",A,fi,y?,ff SL*,

¶12

' F,?T#mij/!#fl:fffilXRao^{(rate), ased 47 years} occ. Business,

¶13

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶14

ffi"tflt#.:;fi#,ffi.tfr f,*'##$fi"l]i{rH#tr

¶15

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶16

";g**n:u'::Irnftl-*ffi,lH[Uffi

¶17

,t-itt#it+***:ll,,u;irmappeared for the Respondent

¶18

The Court made the foltowing: ORDER

¶19

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITI ON No.723O O F 2O2L

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code^{of Criminal} Procedure, 1973 (for short'Cr.P.C.') by the^{petitioners-Accused No.12 to quash} the^proceedings against^{him in FIR No.69 of 2021 pending on the file of Station} HouseOfficer,KodadruralPoliceStation,suryapetDistrict'filedforthe offences^{punishable under sections 420, 423, 468, 47t, 503 r/w l2OBrlw34} IPC, 156(3)^Cr.P.C.

¶23

Heard.^{Perusedthe record}

¶24

On instructions,^{learned Additional Public Prosecutorwould submit that} after^{completionof investigationin the subject crime' the police filed charge} sheet^{beforethe Court concerned'}

¶25

Recording^{the aforesaidsubmission' the CriminalPetition is dismissed as} infructuous.^{However'the petitioners-AccusedNo'12is at liberty to movethis} Court^{seekingquashment of the proceedingsof the charge sheet by raising all} the^grounds'

¶26

Miscellaneous^{Petitions' pendingifany,shall stand closed'}

¶27

SD,-MOHD.^{SANAULLAHANSARI} ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR /ITRUE^COPY/' u---' SECTION^OFFICER

¶28

To,

¶29

The^{Station HouseOfficer'Kodad Rural PoliceStation'Suryapet District'}

¶30

One^{CCto Sri G Ravi ChandraSekhar'Advocate [OPUC]} ? Two CCs to^{the Public Prosecutor'High Court for the State of Telanganaat} -' Hvderabad' [OUTI \ . :::^x::-:.'^rrv:-

¶31

HIGH COURT

¶32

DATED:0210312023

¶33

.(Y\ g STATF- C
(
/-) :
io 11 fiN ?.{i3
.t

¶34

ORDER

¶35

CRL.P.No.7230 of 2021

¶36

DISMIS!NG THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶37

p-,

Chintala Rajeshwari v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chintala Rajeshwari v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bommida Ravinder , Ravi Vs The State of Telangana

M/s.Laxmee Polymer Pipe Industries and Another Vs The State of Telangana and another

Naini Yadagiri Vs The State of Telangana

Faiyaz , Khaja Naseruddin ahmed Vs The State of Telangana

K.Mamatha and 3 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Mohd. Azar Vs The State of Telangana