The High Court of Telangana dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition due to the de-facto complainant not being a party.
Permission to withdraw the criminal petition and subsequently file a fresh petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132541
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CRIMINAL PETITION NO:6523 OF 2023
Between:
...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad Telangana.
...Respondent
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for and Quash the CC No.247l2O2O pending on the file of Honb'le Addl. Judicial First-Class Magistrate, at Siddipet, against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3, in the interest of justice.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2023
Petition unde r Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grou n ds of Criminal
Petition, the High Court may bepleased togrant interirn stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitiotrers Nos.1 to 3 in CC No.24712020,pending before the Hon'ble Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Siddipet,pending disposal of themain Criminal Petition in the interest ofjustice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Togiti Nagender, Advocate for the Petiticners and the Sri S.Ganesh, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the, Respondent No.'1 .
The Court made the following:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIIVIINAL PETITION No.'6523 of 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the de-facto complainant is not made as a party to the present criminal petition and therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh criminal petition.
withdrawn with a liberty as sought for.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand
closed.
To,
SD/- MOHD SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYil L-g SECTION OFFICER
SS
TJ
Q{^q.
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/0812023
,./' ,,-; i r .\l ; c
/'' ')'
2 1 iitP 2m
'tt,*
'- -
ORDER
CRLP.No.6523 of 2023
This Criminal Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
v"lql>g'
Bandaram Mohan Goud
Bandaram Madhu Goud
Bandaram Srinivas Goud
State of Telangana
G. Anupama Chakravarty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
