Bandaram Srinivas Goud v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal petition was dismissed as it stood withdrawn by the petitioner along with pleas in IIIA. No substantive legal propositions were laid down.
The criminal petition was dismissed as it stood withdrawn by the petitioner along with pleas in IIIA. No substantive legal propositions were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132s4 |
!N THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY. THE SECOND DAYOF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:6495OF 2023
Between:
Bandaram Srinivas Goud,S/o Late BalaMallu Goud Age: 50 years' Occ: RTC employee,R/o H.No.4-3-2, Patelpura, Siddipet,Telangana State.
... Petitioner/Accused
AND
The State of Telangana,Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telanganaat Hyderabad,Telangana.
...Respondent
Petition under Sectio n 482 of Cr.P.C prayrng that in the circu msta nces stated in the N/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto call for and Quashthe CC No.63612022pending onthe file of Honour-able Prl Judicial First-class Magistrate, at Siddipet,against the Petitioner/Accused, in the interest of justice.
LA. NO:1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cprayingthat in the circu mstances stated in the Memorandum ofGrounds of Criminal Petition, the High courtmay be pleasedto grant interimstay of all furthe-r p."..ding" i-ncluding the appearanceof -the Petitioner in CC No.636t2022,pending beforethe Prl Judicial First class Magistrate,at Siddipet,pending disposalof the main Criminal Petition
This Petition comingon forhearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of Groundsof criminalPetitionand uponhearing tfe argumentsof Sri Togiti Nagender' Advocate for the Petitionerand S.Ganesh,Assistant PublicProsecutor on behalfof the Respondent
The Courtmadethe following:
HON'BLE S r{'I. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMACHAI{R,\V,IRTHY
CI: tIvIINAL PETI'UON No.6495of 2t)2:i
ORDEF.:
I 'r fl-r'rl :'r,irrrst l lrI lirc l)('lilir)rt't :il r','i lrrrt tilc tlt'J'actct(ron-L )l,tinilr'lt is ttot rrrrtdc as;t l)itlI' 0 | r( l)rcsellt ::-imjna, i-r,tli r ,n rtntl t lrt L-,'lirt r-, hc sc.'i<s I,r'r' r'i l j onol-l lris LollIt ti ',,r iL r:lri u' llrI r'ilrnt:ral pctiIiolt r tlr li'( 11\ 1() lhe :r'tjtioncr r,r I 1, a fn'sh crirnir-tal l)ctition.
.1. AccortJ ri1l,t', tlris(lritnit'trti Pctitiorr is d irj nr is sccl .LS u ithclra,r"'r r.,- h a lilrr:rti :rs s rughL lirr. M st','ll rlrrius I), titiorLs, ncncling i1 rr.t,. ;r:rl stand
,:losed.
Sd/-C. PR,'WEEN KUMAR ASSISiT,\N: REGISTRAR
//TRL'E COPY//
S'E:CTION OFFICER
To,
SS 6, tlM
HIGH COLJRT
DATED:02108,r;?023
r F
e€- o
t. ,, *
,I
t
I, r)t ,1 1 St? uts Ct
t')
., j
t
<br>'. .. -r r. !..t t-.,
-: : : .-I
ORDER
CRLP.No.649ll of 2023
DISMISSING I F{E CRLP AS WITHDRAWTI
c4" )., r.^ zrn) ';9
Bandaram Srinivas Goud
The State of Telangana
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court