Dismissed

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Mar 2023CRLP/6457/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of criminal proceedings as infructuous due to the filing of a charge sheet. The co-accused is permitted to move the Court separately for quashing of the charge sheet proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; petitioner-accused free to seek quashing of charge sheet separately.

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar Vs The State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s1 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF^MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:6457 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar @ Kumar, S/o Veera Narayana^{Murthy,aged 38} years, Occ Business, Ri,/o Bavajipet Village, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. State

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED.5

¶10

AND

¶11

'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad

¶12

The Station House Officer, Khammam lll Town Police Station, Khammam, Telangana State.

¶13

Kakarparthy Venkataram Prathap, S/o Appa Rao, aged 41^years, Occ Business, Fl/o H.No. 2-1-249, Gandhi Chowk, Khammam, Telangana State.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONOENTS 1 & 2/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to^pass orders^quashing the^proceedings in Crime No. 100 of 2019 on the file of Khammam lll Town Police Station relating to the^petitioner

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2020

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay all further^proceedings in connection with Crime No.^{100 of} 2019 on the file of the Khammam lll Town Police Station,^pending disposal^{of the} above Criminal Petition

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum^of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri D^V Nagarjuna Babu, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional^Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 & 2 and None Appeared^{for the} Respondent No.3

¶19

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.6457 OF 2O2O

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 7973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioner who is arrayed as Accused No.5 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.100 of 2019 on the hle of Station House Oflicer, Khammam III Tou,n Police Station, Khammam, registered for the offences punishabte under Sections 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶24

On written instructior-rs, learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that after completion of investigation in the subject crime, the police liled charge sheet before the Court concerned and C.C.No.2456 of 2022 was assigned. Hence, the prayer sought for in the present petition has become infructuous.

¶25

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner-Accused is at liberty to move this Court seeking quashment of the proceedings of the charge sheet.

¶26

Miscellaleorrs Pet itions , pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶27

To,

¶28

Sd/-MOHD.SANAULLAH ANSARI ttrRuEcopytt ASSISTANT REGISTRAR GO--''"^'' SECT]ON OFFICER

¶29

I ll,i [#fl'li:X#if5]:l'191"'..^{Masistrate at} Khammam HyderabadloU1l^{rosecutor'Highcourt for the} state Jrelangana at

¶30

3 The Station House Officer, Khammam lll Town Police Station, Khammam, Telangana State.

¶31

¶32

One CC to Sri D V Nagarjuna Babu, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies plp

) I

HIGH COURT

DATED:0910312023

ORDER

CRLP.No.6457 of 2020

1 -, lj aar{: -
(<
l
s 2 i'1lY ?$8
I
: .,,j

¶39

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶40

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gampa Krishnaveni Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Ponnala Rukmini and Another Vs The State of Telangana and Another

G.Jeevan Kumar Vs The state of Telangana and another

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar Shp Veera Narayana Murthy Vs The State of Telangana

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Allam Hari Vs The State of Telangana and another