Dismissed

Allam Hari v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC9 Mar 2023CRLP/5896/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed by an accused under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings involving offences under Sections 354, 323 and 506 IPC. The Court held that prima facie allegations were insufficient to quash the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.49B of 2022 is dismissed.

Allam Hari Vs The State of Telangana and another — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

t3251 l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K, SURENDER

¶6

Between:

¶7

{l!am^{Hari, s/o.chandramouli, Aged.} ?gou!^{38 years,} occ^press reporter, R/o.H.No.B-18, shayampet Village and Mandar, Hanamkonda District

¶8

...PETITIONERYACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

1- The State of Telangana, Represented by it's Public Prosecutor, High Court Premises, Hyderabad

¶11

2- Smt. Nagurla Mounika, Wo.Srika.nth, AgeO about 23 years, Occ Housewife, R/o.Shayampet Village and Mandal, Haiamkoda Distiict.

¶12

RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.498 of 2022 on the iile or Judicijl First Class Magistrate . at Parakal, Hanumkoda District for the offences punishable under Section 354,923 of lndian penal Code.

¶14

t.A. NO: 1 OF 2022

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated ln the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may !e^{pleased to grant Stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.49A} oi ZOZZ on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate at Parakit, Hanumkoda District for the offences punishable under section 3s4, s2g of lndian penal code.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirninal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri THUMU CHANDRA SHEKAR, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

Crl.Petition No.5896 ot 2022

¶19

¶20

t {

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5896 OF 2022

¶23

ORD ER:

¶24

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the^Code of

¶25

¶26

)

¶27

Criminal Procedure ,^{Lg73 (for short 'Cr.P.C.) by the petitioner-} accused to^quash the^proceedings against^{him in C.C.No.49B of 2022} pending on the file of ludicial First Class^Magistrate at^Parakal Hanumkoda District, for^{the offencesunderSections 354, 324 and} 506 of Indian^{Penal Code.}

¶28

?-. Heard learned counsel for the^{petitionerand learned} Additional Public Prosecutor^{for the respOndent} -^{State.Perused the} record

¶29

Prima facie allegations of complaint are attracting^section354 of I.P.C, since, it^{is alleged that the petitionerwas teasing and ill-} treating the complainant to^{fulfill his sexual desire. Therefore, there} are no^grounds to^{quash the proceedings, accordingly the petitionis} dismissed

¶30

Crl.Petition No.589G ot 2O22

Iili

t \

However, the trial court shall draw its own conclusions on the

¶35

basis of the evidence adduced at the time of trial uninfluenced by

¶36

the observations made herein.

¶37

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SRI MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI

¶38

ASSISTANT //TRUE COPYII

¶39

To,

¶40

sEcTtoN oFFICER

¶41

1- The lst class Magistrate at parakal, Hanumakonda District

¶42

2' Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶43

The station House officer, shayanpet police station, Hanamkonda

¶44

4- one cc to sRr rHUMU CHANDRA SHEKAR, Advocate topucl

¶45

Two CD Copies

BNI\d)*-

HIGH COURT

DATED:09/03/2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.5896 of 2022

1t'lE ST4
(.
'l 11Apt ?lIJ

¶52

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶53

\A
\

Allam Hari v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Allam Hari v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gampa Krishnaveni Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Ponnala Rukmini and Another Vs The State of Telangana and Another

G.Jeevan Kumar Vs The state of Telangana and another

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar Shp Veera Narayana Murthy Vs The State of Telangana

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Tunuguntla Naresh Kumar , Kumar Vs The State of Telangana