Dismissed

Devireddy Akki Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC27 Mar 2023CRLP/6379/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment of proceedings. The petition was declared infructuous because the police had already filed a charge sheet upon completion of investigation, rendering the prayer moot. The petitioner was permitted to file a separate petition to quash only the charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous due to filing of charge sheet; liberty given to move for quashment of charge sheet.

Devireddy Akki Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

IVONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6379 OF 2020

¶6

Between:

¶7

Devireddy Akki Reddy, S/o Chinna Laxmaiah, Aged about 43 years, Occ.Business, R:/o H.No.2-4-12414, Plot No.4 part, Road No.12, Swaroop Nagar, Near Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Uppal, K.V. Ranga Reddy - 500 039, Telangana State.

¶8

...PETITIONERYACCUSED No.3

¶9

AND^,

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor. High Court at Hyderabad. 2. K.Saidulu, S/o Not Known, Aged major, Occ. Police Officer, L.B.Nagar, O/o LB Nasar PS' Rachakonda' Ransareddv t"''[n=TSotitE'NT/coMpLATNANTS ''tt,.'"''

¶11

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.235 of 2019 dated 271O212019 of P.S., L.B.Nagar L and O, Rachakonda District, against the Petitioner/A-3.

¶12

l.A. NO: 1OF 2020

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of FIR in Crime No.235 of 2019 dated 2710212019 of P.S., L.B.Nagar L and O, Rachakonda District, against the Petitioner/A-3, pending disposal of the Main Quash Petition.

¶14

l.A. NO:2OF 2020

¶15

Petition under Section 482 o'f CI.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crime No.235 of 2019 dated 2710212019 of P.S., L.B.Nagar L and O, Rachakonda District, against the Petitioner/A-3.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V RAIVIAKRISHNA REDDY, Advocate for the petitioner and the Additional public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

t I

¶19

I I

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6379 OF 2O2O

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, L973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioner/accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in FIR No.235 of 2019 on the file of Station House Office, L.B. Nagar L and O Police Station, Rachakonda District, registered for the offences punishable under Section 170, 419, 467, 468, 471 of IPC, Section 24 (lB) (b) Arms Act.

¶24

On written instructions and as per e-courts status information, learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that after completion of investigation in the subject crime, the police filed charge sheet before the Court concerned and FIR No.235 of 2019 was assigned. Hence, the^prayer sought for in the^{present petition} has become infructuous.

¶25

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as Infructuous. However, the^{petitioner-AccusedNo.3 is} at liberty to move this Court seeking^{quashmentof the proceedings} of the charge sheet.

¶26

Miscellaneous^{Petitions, pending if any'shall stand closed'}

¶27

Sd/. C. PRAVEEN^KUMAR ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

1 \

//TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The ll Metropolitan Magistrate,^{Cyberabad at L.B-Nagar}

¶34

The Station House Officer, L.B.Nagar^{L and O PoliceStation, Rachakonda'}

¶35

Two CC to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶36

One CC to Sri V.Ramakrishna REddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶37

Two CD Copies

BJLB

HIGH COURT

DATED:2il03t2023

*o 1HE SI4 15.
vl
c l
L) 16 ltAY WIJ r

¶43

ORDER

¶44

CRLP.No.6379^{of 2O2O}

¶45

\s^D\sr{\ssED

¶46

lt^$|lh:s[J:N

¶47

E
Cpq'
@
ffi,@

Devireddy Akki Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devireddy Akki Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Yadaiah and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

Sudhendra Baru Vs The State of Telangana

Velpula Devender Vs The State of Telangana

Korre Chandra Mouli Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Ponnala Kalinga Reddy Vs State of Telangana and another

Nayini Srikar Chandra Vs The State of Telangana