Dismissed

Nayini Srikar Chandra v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC27 Mar 2023CRLP/412/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court accepted a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings in a dowry dispute. Finding inordinate delay without progress, the Court directed the trial Court to dispose of the case within three months and dismissed the quashing petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to lower court to dispose of the main case within three months; quashing petition dismissed.

Nayini Srikar Chandra Vs The State of Telangana — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

13251 l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CR!MINA L PETITION NO: 412 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Nayini Srikar Chandra, S/o^{Chandra Narayanaaged about 31 years'occ.} Private Service Bangalore.

¶8

Chandra Narayana, S/o Komuraiah,^{aged about 64 years, occ. Retired} Emplovee, r/o H.no. 8-6-170, Alkapuri^{Colony, KarimnagarDistrict.}

¶9

Padmdvathy, wio Chandrayanarayana,^{agedabout 50 years, occ.Housewife,} r/o H.No. 8-6-370, Alkapuri Colony, .^{KarimnagarDistrict.}

¶10

. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.S 1 TO³

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, through^{S.H.O., Women Police Station, DD,} Hyderabad rep. by its Public Prosecutor,^{HighCourt,Hyderabad} _ _

¶13

Smt. Bakka Sneha Latha, w/o Nayini^{Srikar Chandra, aged about 25 years,} r/o C-block, G-2, Asbestos Staff Quarters Czech^{Colony, Sanathnagar,} Hvderabad

¶14

...RES'.NDENTS/..M'LA.NANT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^{prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court may} be^pleased to^quash the^{proceedings in C.C.No.257 of 2021 on the file of the} Xlll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate^{at Hyderabad,and to grant such other} relief or reliefs as this Honble Court deems^{fit and properin the circumstances of} the case.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,theHighCourtmay} be pleased to^grant stay of all further^{proceedings includingthe appearanceof} the petitioners in C.C.No. 257 of 2021 on the file of the^{Xlll Addl' Chief} Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad^pending disposal^{of the CriminalPetition.}

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon^{perusingthe Memorandumof} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon^{hearing the argumentsof Sri N HARI} PRASAD ,Advocate for the Petitioner^{and of the Additional PublicProsecutoron} behalf of the Respondent No.1 and^{for the RespondentNo.2 NoneAppeared.} The Court made the following: OROER

¶19

\ \

¶20

I t

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.412 OF 2O22

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 3 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C. No.257 of 2O2l on the frle of learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. The offences alleged against them are under Sections 498-A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code (for short'lPCl and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State. Perused the record.

¶26

The case is of the year 2Ol7 and there is no progress in the matter. Without going into the facts of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible within a period of three (03) months.

¶27

¶28

¶29

Accordingly, the Criminai Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶30

ciosed.

¶31

SD/.SD/- MOHD.ISMA ASSISTANT REGIS R

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad

¶36

The Station House Officer., WPS,CCS, Hyderabad. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶37

One CC to SRI N. HARI PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]

¶38

Two CD Copies

EDS

Esq.

HIGH COURT

DATED:2710312023

1 {E STATG o
o 1B [Ps ?slx i:i-t
'{
i o=" . -' !<
---__

¶44

ORDER

¶45

CRLP.No.412 of 2022

¶46

DISPOSING OF THE CRL.P

¶47

Nayini Srikar Chandra v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nayini Srikar Chandra v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Yadaiah and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

Sudhendra Baru Vs The State of Telangana

Velpula Devender Vs The State of Telangana

Korre Chandra Mouli Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Ponnala Kalinga Reddy Vs State of Telangana and another

R.Yadaiah Vs The State of Telangana and another