Dismissed

Annam Veerraju, And Another v. The State of Telangana, And Another

Telangana HC21 Nov 2023CRLP/5634/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash proceedings for offences under Section 468 IPC, holding that trial is necessary to prove the defence. The court directed the petitioners to be represented by counsel under Section 205 Cr.P.C. before the trial court subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed. Petitioners directed to apply under Section 205 Cr.P.C. to be represented by counsel before Trial Court.

Annam Veerraju, And Another Vs The State of Telangana… — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5634 OF 2019

¶6

BETWEEN

¶7

Annam Veerraju, S/o Annam Pinna Rao, Aged about 36^years, occ. Private Service.

¶8

Annam Pinna Rao, S/o Late Rammurthy, Aged about 69^years.

¶9

Both are Fl/o H.No. 4-1 1-39, Naidupeta, Second lane, Koritipadu, Guntur.

¶10

...Petitioners/ Accused No's.1 & 2.

¶11

AND

¶12

1 . The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., Saroomagar Women^{Police Station,} Cyberabad District, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

¶13

Smt. Annam Swapna, W/o Veerraju, Aged about 34^years, occ. Housewife Fl/o George Venture, Kammaguda, Turkayamjal, Hayathnagar Mandal, R.R.District.

¶14

...Respondents/ComPlainants.

¶15

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^{may be} pleased to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in C.C.No.382'1 of 2018 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B. Nagar, and to^{quash the} proceedings thereon.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2019

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^{may be} pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the charge sheet in C.C.No.382'1 of 2018 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate^{at L.B.Nagar.}

¶18

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2O19

¶19

Petition under section 482 of cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in c.c.No.3821 of 2018 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the Criminal petition.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri K. Joseph, Advocate for the Petitioner, The public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or through her counser.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^K.SURENDER

¶24

CRIMINAL PETITION No.5634^{of 2OL9}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This Criminal Petition^{is f,rled under Section 482 of the} Code of Criminal Procedure,^{1973 (for short 'Cr.P'C'') by the} petitioners/Al & A,2 to^{quash the proceedings against them} in C.C.No.382l of^{2018 on the hle of XIV Metropolitan} Magistrate at L.B.Nagar.^{The offences allegedagainst the} petitioners are under Section^{468 (A) of the Indian Penal} Code.

¶27

Heard learned^{counsel for the petitioners/A1 & A2, and} learned Additiona-l^{Public Prosecutor for the respondent-} State.

¶28

On^{perusalof the facts and circumstancesof the case,} the petitioners/Al &^{A2 have to undergo the trial to prove} their defence and^{the sarne carnot be considered and quash} the proceedings.

¶29

AccordinglY, there^{are nogrounds and the Criminal} Petition is dismissed.^{However, in theevent ofthe}

¶30

petitioners/A1 & A.2 filing an application under Section 205 of cr.P.c', to be represented by a counsel, the same shail be

¶31

considered by the Trial Court, by rmposlng conditions,

¶32

without hindrance to the trial.

¶33

Miscellaneous applications pending, if arry, shall stand

¶34

closed.

¶35

¶36

SD/. SRI NAYANI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// V

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 The XIV Metropolitan Magistrate at L.B. Nagar.

¶41

2 The Station House Officer, Saroornagar WPS., Cyberabad.

¶42

3 One CC to Sri K. Joseph, Advocate [OPUC]

¶43

4 Two CC to the Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad tOUI 5 Two CD Copies

JCK

KMS

I ./

HIGH COURT KS, J DATED: 211'1112023

¶49

ORDER

¶50

cRLP.NO.s634 0F 2019

¶51

1H E ST4 r
(
+ +v
o 3 0 JAti 2024
t .|,(-)
* o *
DEsPA rciii

¶52

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION.

¶53

rO aa\'+

Annam Veerraju, And Another v. The State of Telangana, And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Annam Veerraju, And Another v. The State of Telangana, And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jameel Sheik Vs State of Telangana

Chand Shaik Yasin Vs State of Telangana

Chand Shaik Yasin Vs State of Telangana

K.Narayanappa Vs the State of Telangana

BonthalaAishwarya Vs The State of Telangana

K.Prem Sagara Rao, Vs Punjab National Bank