Chand Shaik Yasin v. the State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by accused to quash proceedings or dispense with attendance. Court dispensed with attendance of specific accused subject to affidavit and appearance order, dismissing the petition otherwise.
What did the court decide?
Dispensation of attendance of petitioners-accused subject to filing affidavit and appearance when required; criminal petition disposed of.
What the court decided
1
J l J i HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I i I tttoruonv,THE TwENTIETH DAy oF NovEMBER : TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE: f tl s PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
. CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5249 OF 2018
Between:
- 1, Chand Shaik Yasin, S/o C.S.Khaseem Peer, Ryo.H.No.lV-2-6,Krishna Nagar,
- rf:I Madanapalle Town and Mandal, Chittoor District.
- , 2. Seelamsdtti Nagaraju, S/o Narasimhulu, R./o.H.No.9-115-17-E,Easwaramrna Colony, Madanapalli Town,Chiftoor District.
- ,t.t 3..'Tatiparthi Gopi,S/o' Ramu, R/o.H.No.4-88-ET,Chalapathi Rao Colony, trr Madanapalli Town aM Mandal;Chittoor District.
- 4.;.K.Uila Devi @ Uma Rani, Wo K.S.Shiva, R/o.H.No.7-44,singamvaripalli,
- ) #Ramasamudram Mandal, Chittoor Disfiq! 1tu,aoo,,k
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the attendance of accused persons- Accused Nos.3,4,6,8 & 11 can be dispensed with subject to filing an affidavit and appearance when directed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chand Shaik Yasin
- petitioner
Seelamsdtti Nagaraju
- petitioner
Tatiparthi Gopi
- petitioner
K.Uila Devi @ Uma Rani
- petitioner
Pasupuleti Reddamma
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/5249/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court