Dismissed

Smt P.Jhansi Rani and Another v. State of a.P., and Another

Telangana HC4 Aug 2023CRLP/2950/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposal of a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C and an application under Section 492 Cr.P.C requesting stays on further proceedings. The Court dismissed both petitions as infructuous because the underlying criminal case (C.C.No.206/2013) had already been disposed of by the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 2950/2014 and I.A. No. 2/2014 dismissed as infructuous due to disposal of the underlying case.

Smt P.Jhansi Rani and Another Vs State of a.P… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

I32ee I

¶2

IN THE HTGII COURT FOR THE STATE OF I-ELANGANA AT HYDtrRABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2950 OF 2014

¶6

Between:

¶7

Smt P.Jhansi Rani Wo Late P.V.Narayana Murthy, R/o Flat No. 14, SRR Layout-Il, Behind DRDO, II Phase, Durganagar post, Mahadevapura, Bangalore- 16.

¶8

G. Arun Kumar, S/o Late G.Rama Rao, fuo H.No.27-l-1679, S.D.Road, Balaji Nagar, Nellore Town, SPSR Nellore District.

¶9

...Petitioner/Accused Nos.2 and 3 In CC.No.206/2013

¶10

AND

¶11

STATE OF A.P, Women PS., Begumpet, Hyderabad Rep. by the public Prosecut,or, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.

¶12

Smt.P.Lavanya, Wo P.Srinivas, Occ Private Employee, R/o H.No.6-317912, Jawahar Nagar Colony, New Boiguda, Secunderabad, Hyderabad District.

¶13

...Respondent/Complainants

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to an in connection with CC.No.206l2013 on the file of the court of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad and declare the same as illegal and not maintainable consequentially quash the same

¶15

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2014 ( I{LPMP. NO: 2684 C)F 2014)

¶16

Petition unrlc Section^z1ti2 of cr.p.C praying rhar Lr^.tre : irctrrris tances stated in the lVlerrro lrrdum of ,Grouncls of criminal l)ctili rrr. tlrc FIigh courl may be pleasecl to s r., all lurther proccedings includrng tn : irpp;arance of the Petitioncrs in^('C.N .)061201i on the llle of thc corrrt olrlre ).v Additional Chief Metlopolitar 14agistrate at IIl,derabad, p<.ndin1 disposal of the Criniinal Petiti,)n.

¶17

-l-his Petiti,rr c,rming on lbr hearing, upon pe..rsir-11 rhe vemorandum of Grourds of c'ir i. al Pelition and upon hearing thc a --r: urr:nts of Sri K ANANI)A RAO. ,' 3,,er:ate tor rlre l,ctitioner, Sri Vrz,a.irrh \li, Assistant Public I)r'osec.tor. ( r bchall'ol'the Rcspondent No. Nr:rc apPearerl fbr the Respontle nt No.2.

¶18

The Corrrt madc rh lirllorving:

¶19

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION No.295O OF 2oL4

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

Mr. K.Ananda Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the subject matter of the criminal petition has become infructuous as the case is disposed of before the Court below^yide order dated 24.11.2017 in C.C.No.206 of 2013. To substantiate the same, learned counsel filed a copy of e-courts proceedings. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the criminal petition as infructuous.

¶23

Mr. Vizarath Ali learned Assistalt Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent is present.

¶24

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶25

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if aly, shall stand closed.

¶26

Sd/- G. SIRE SHA ASSISTANT REGIS R

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

I . The XV Additional Chief Metropolitan^{Mhgistrateat Hyderabad.} 2. The Station House Officer, Police Station^{WPS Begumpet,} Secunderabad.

¶31

3.^-Two CCs to PLiBLIC^{PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of} Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶32

One CC to Sri K ANANDA^{RAO, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶33

Two CD Copies SP

¶34

HIGH COUR'T

¶35

DA'IED:04/0tt/202

¶36

(;S
<r:-'i(:'
ti,i
')l
\ r .i'
\ .-..

¶37

ORDER

¶38

CRLP.No.2950 of 0 {4

¶39

CRII{INAL I'Ii I-I^'ION IS DISMISSF,T) AS INFRUC'|'UO| S

¶40

<br>tii
Nfr \4 D,)

Smt P.Jhansi Rani and Another v. State of a.P., and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt P.Jhansi Rani and Another v. State of a.P., and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandapangu Ravi, Nalgonda Dist. Vs Chandapangu Rajini, Nalgonda Dist. and Ano

Ch.Guruswamy , Peter , Kishore, Hyd., Vs Ch.Padmini, R.R.Dt and Anr, Rep Pp.

Suvarna Rajanna, Karimnagar Dt and 2 Otrs., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Saayani Venkata Sesh Arun Kumar Vs Smt Gunthi Revathi and Another

Lagishetty Yadagiri, Vs Lagishetty Bal Laxmi, and 3 Others

Smt. Renuguntla Balamani, Dilsukhnagar, Hyd and 2 Othrs., Vs Smt. Renuguntla Padma, Kothapet, R.R.Dt and 2 Othrs, Rep Pp.