The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear for hearing despite prior listings and the matter being listed for dismissal.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; liberty granted to explore alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16381 OF 2014
i Between:
' ANIL KRISHNA CHITTURI, USA.,, S/o C.K.Murty, Ocr Private service No.1202, Margaret Court, South Plain Field, New Jersey 07080,U.S-A
...PETITIONER/Respondent
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
. Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the interim maintenance order dated 18-10-2014passed by the Addl. Family Court, Hyderabad in Crl.MP.No. 4 of 2O14 in M.C.no. 386 of 2012 in the interest ofjustice and toprevent abuse of the dueprocess of law.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 17627 o F 20141
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct stay of all proceedings in M.P.No.4 of 2014 in MC-No.386 of 2012 pending disposal of this Criminal Petition in the interest of Justice and to prevent abuse of the due process of Law.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S A V RATNAM ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri E. Poornachandu Rao,Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.16381 of 2OL4
ORDER:
None appears for the petitioner. Even on the previous dates of hearing i.e., on O1.11.2023 and O8. 1 1.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, though the matter was Iisted under the caption 'For Dismissal', none appeared for the petitioner.
Pending miscellaneous applications, i[ any, shall stand
closed
STY. MOHD.SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
/ITRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:2O11112023
ORDER
CRLP.No.16381 of2014
1 tTE S T,A.r{'
t
q
J
3 13 JAli 2024 (i)?.
-,,'/
* i7
D5 pATCH!i o
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON- PROSECUTION
@f"("
*o=--
-41p4-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C should be allowed when the petitioner did not appear for hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Krishna Chitturi
Smt. Minati Chitturi
Baby Anya Chitturi
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
