Dismissed

Burela Mallesham, Nalgonda Dt. v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Telangana HC2 Nov 2023CRLP/14942/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Counsel submitted the petition did not survive. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 14942 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions to close.

Burela Mallesham, Nalgonda Dt. Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:1 4942oF 2014

¶6

Between:

¶7

,| B1JRE[.A MALLESHAM, NALGONDA DT., S/o Venkatarang aiah aged about 47 years, Occupation Daily Labour, R/o purushoftam Complex, Vanijya Bhavan Center, Suryapet Mandal, Nalgonda District

¶8

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

1 STATE OF TELANGANA, REP. BY P.P., HYD AND ANR, rep by irs pubtic Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶11

2 Burela Krishnaveni, Wo Mallesham, aged 28 years, Occ Housewifu, Rl/o Purushottam Complex, Vanijya Bhavan Centei, Suryapet Mandal, Nilgonda District.

¶12

...(DEFACTO COMPLATNANT)

¶13

RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.81712014 dated 07107t2014 on the file of the Judicial First class Magistrate (for Prohibition and Excise offences) at Nalgonda.

¶15

LA. NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 15826OF 2O't4 )

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in CC.No.817/2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate (for Prohibition and Excise Offences) at Nalgonda pending disposal of the Criminal Petitioner.

¶17

l.A. NO: I OF 201 4tCRLPMP. NO: '15713 OF 201.4

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the charge sheet No. 81712O14 dated 0710712014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Nalgonda for the present.

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri VIVEK JAIN, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri VIZARATH ALl, the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.'l

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.L4942 OF 2014

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

The present Criminal Petition is filed under Section^{482 of} Cr.P.C, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.8l7 of^2Ol4 d.ated 07.O7.2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class (for Prohibition and Excise^{offences) at Nalgonda.}

¶25

Ms.Sunitha, learned counsel for the^{petitionerfairly} submits that the cause in the criminal^{petitiondoes not surrrive.} Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal^{Petition as infructuous.}

¶26

Mr. Vizarath Ali, learned Assistant^{Public Prosecutor} appearing for the respondent State^{takes no objectionto the} sarne.

¶27

Recording the submissions made by the learned^counsel, this Criminal Petition is dismissed^{as infructuous.}

¶28

Miscellaneous Petitions,^pending if^{any, shall stand closed.}

¶29

SD'. V. HARI PRASAD ASS]STANT REGIS R

¶30

//TRUE COPY//

¶31

SECTION OFFICER

¶32

To, 1. The Judicial^{First class Magistratefor Prohibition and Excise offences,} Nalgonda, Nalgonda^District.

¶33

The-Station^{HoluseOfficer,W.P.S Nalgonda,Nalgonda District'}

¶34

3.TwoCC'stoPublicProsecutor,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat HyderabadIOUT].

¶35

a. One CC to SRl.^{VIVEK JAIN,Advocate} [OPUC]'

¶36

Two CD CoPies

4.+trtvn

HIGH COURT

EW, J

DATED: 02111l,2023

1P. E sTAle
q
2 I JAN 202[ o
oo Jt

D.f t')..', r,\

¶42

ORDER

¶43

CRLP.No.14942 ot 2014

¶44

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶45

2r"'

Burela Mallesham, Nalgonda Dt. v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Burela Mallesham, Nalgonda Dt. v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Mallikarjuna Reddy , Malli , Arjun and Another Vs the State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp and Another

C. Rama Raju, Hyd Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano

B.Rajesekhar Reddy Vs C.v.Rami Reddy and Another

Thogara Venkateswarlu, Khm Dist. Vs Thogara Pedda Atchaiah, Khm Dist. and 2 Othrs

K. Shekher Reddy, Hyd Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Arimalla Anuradha, Hyd., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.