Dismissed

C. Rama Raju, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Telangana HC1 Nov 2023CRLP/15910/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana heard a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking appointment of a commission and stay of proceedings. The petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition, which the Court subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by consent of the State.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.

C. Rama Raju, Hyd Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

t^32ee I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE '

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMIN AL PETITloN NO. 1s9 10 0F 20,t4

¶7

Between:

¶8

C. Rama Raiu, S/o. C. Narasimha Raju, Aged 87 years, N_o. 11_72411, Flat No.4, Sharada Apahments, Moosaram eagt-,lA;oEiJei rr,t'"Gtp'"t coronv, Hyd;;#j'"

¶9

...PETITIONERYDEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶10

AND

¶11

state of relangana, Rep. by its pubric prosecutor, High court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶12

The.Ranga Red_dy Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., Reg. No.TB503, H.No.1.l_9 .8-,.Abhiteja.,^{RB Cqs.e,GroundFtoor + and} S,"t_ii.nriirgi;'doionv, Kothapet, Hyderabad-35, rep. by its C.E.O.

¶13

...RESPONOENTS

¶14

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the learned Judiciar First class Magistrate, special Mobile Court cum-Xl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, L.B. Nagar to appoint a commission to examine the petitioner in c.c. No.534 oI 2012, in the interest of justice.

¶15

l.A. NO: 1 OF 14(CRLPMP. NO:17 033 0F 2014)

¶16

Pe{ition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in c.c. No.534 of 2012 on the file of Judicial First class Magistrate, special Mobile court-cum-xl Metropolitan

¶17

¶18

Magistrate, Cyberabad, L.B. Nagar, pending disposal of the quashing petition before this Hon'ble High Court.

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri H. PRAHALADA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

)

I )

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶25

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1591O of 2@L4

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

The present criminal petition is filed to direct the leamed Judicial First Class Magistrate, Special Mobile Court - cum - XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, L.B.Nagar to appoint a Commission to examine^the petitioner in C.C.No.534 of 2O12.

¶28

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner - de facto complainant as well as the learned Assistant^Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1 - State.

¶29

Irarned counsel for the^petitioner - de facto complainant upon instructions of the^{petitioner,seeks} permission of this Court to withdraw the^{present criminal} petition.

¶30

Permission is accorded.

¶31

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor^{appearing for} respondent No. I - State is^{present and takes no objection} to the same.

r.rc

Recording the submissions made by the learned

¶36

counsel for the petitioner - de facto complainant as well as the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.l - State, this Court is inclined to dismiss the criminal petition as withdrawn.

¶37

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall

stand closed

I u

To,

sD/' P.^{PADMANABHAREqDY} ASSISTANT BEGIS,TRAR \ //TRUE COPY/' ,ec,oY#rrcen^</sup>

¶42

1 . The Judicial^{First Class Magistrate,. . Special MobileCourt.cum-Xl} ' lvi;iro6litr;Magistrate, cyberabad' L B Nagar'

¶43

2.TheStationHouseOfficer,ChaitanyapuriPolicestation,Hyderabad.

¶44

One^{CC to SRI H PRAHALADA REDDY' Advocate IOPUC]}

¶45

Two^{CCs to Public Prosecutor'High Courtfor the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUTI

¶46

Two CD^CoPies

MP GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:0111112023

1 t{a S T re.
q
C cr n,rZl 0E[ 2023 oz

zO
or- yl
T]

¶51

CRL.P.No.15910 ot 2O14

¶52

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL^PETITION AS WITHDRAWN

¶53

C. Rama Raju, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C. Rama Raju, Hyd v. P.P., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Sriramulu Reddy Vs S.Deepak Reddy

M. Vasu Varma Vs the State of Telangana and 2 Others

D.Sriramulu Reddy Vs S.Deepak Reddy

A.Mallikarjuna Reddy , Malli , Arjun and Another Vs the State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp and Another

B.Rajesekhar Reddy Vs C.v.Rami Reddy and Another

Syed Muneer, Hyd and 2 Otrs Vs State of Telangana, Rep by P.P.,Hyd