Single Judge Bench dismissed a CrPC 482 petition by Arimalla Anuradha seeking to quash criminal proceedings regarding alleged fraud and cheating, opining the matter required a full-fledged trial.
The criminal petition is dismissed; the appearance of the petitioner is dispensed with until required by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I32e91
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14875 OF 2014
Between:
Arimalla Anuradha, Rl/o. Flat No. 30'l , Srinivasa Apartments, Kamalanagar, Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERyACC USED No.4
AND
1 The State of Telangana, through S.H.O. CCS DD, Hyderabad, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C.No.236 of 2011 on the file of the Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 15761 OF 20141
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in CC.No.236/2O11 on the file of the Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Crl.P.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T. ARUNACHALAM, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of none appeared for the th€ Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.14875 OF 20:14
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed seeking to ca-ll for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C.No.236 of 2Ol4 on the file of the learned XII Additional Chief Metropolitan magistrate at Hyderabad and quash the sarne in respect of the petitioner/accused No.4.
2
they threatened to foist SC/ST cases. Basing on thesaid complaint, the CCS, DD police have registered a case in Crime No.10B of 2Ol4 for the offence under Section 420, 406 r /w l2O (B) of IPC. Later the police have filed charge sheet belore the Court of learned XII Additiona,l Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, which is numbered as C.C.No.236 of 2014.
3
I I
,i
4
\
,..r'<br>
available on record, this Court is of the opinion that this matter is pending from quite long time and the truth would be elicited upon completion of a full-fledged trial before the trial Court. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present crirninal petition at this stage. However, the appearance of the petitioner herein is dispensed with unless and until, it is required by the trial Court.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
sD/- P.cr!,s+f;Jf HE3l$HiA
,TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
MP
GJP 6
5F-
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:0211112023
$E STA r€
o^
(
: os JAo. zo2{ z
ol:spnrc,
ORDER
CRL.P.No.14875 ot2014
DISMISSING THE CRIMINALPETITION
@t'e'
\ c-k
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings given the pending nature of the case and the necessity of a full-fledged trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arimalla Anuradha
The State of Telangana
B.Gnaneswar
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
