The High Court of Telangana dismissed the criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the parties had settled the issues outside the court and compromised.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous due to settlement and compromise between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO| 12911 0F 2015
Between:
!!is.s,.N9!9 _Vedre,D/o.Sri.AurobindoVedre Aged about 26 years 3_6_131/1, Flat No 101, Srinivasa Towers, Hyderguda, Hydera"ba-_29.
.PETTTtONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings filed in cc. No. 90 of 20.15 on the flle of the learned vlll Addl. chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioner and pass such other orders.
l.A. NO:1 OF 2015(CRLPMP. NO: 12850 OF 2015)
Petition under section 482 of cr. p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including petitioner's appearance recall of non bailable warrants against the petitioner/Accused in, cc. No. 90 of 2015 on the file of the Learned vlll Addl. chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad and pass
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M/S lndus Law Firm, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE. V. VENUCIOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1291 1 oF 2015
ORDER:
This criminal petition is frled seeking toquash the proceedings filed in C.C.No.9O of 20 15 on thefile of learned VIII Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate, Hyderabad againstthe petitioner.
4 Recording the submissionmade by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this CriminalPetition is dismissedas infructuous'
Miscellaneous Petitions, end if an shall stand closed. sD/. P.CH. NAGABHUSHAMB AsslsrANrffGrsTRAR
,/TRUECOPY/'
SECTIONOFFICER
/
<hl+
\ \
HIGH COURT
DATED:2311112023
ORDER
$g srArs
(
e
o 1 2 rFB 20zl (: tl
* t) ii j:,1r i , '''^
CRLP.No.12911of 2015
Dismissing the Criminal Petition as infructuous
r\t-<br>a\ SlI )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. survives upon settlement and compromise between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vedre, D/o. Sri. Aurobindo Vedre
State of Telangana, rep. by High Court at Hyderabad
Sri. Krupa Satyam Batkishan
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
