The High Court dismissed the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the parties had settled the issues outside the court, and the Assistant Public Prosecutor took no objection.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous; proceeds file shall stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I I I I l
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTYTHIRDDAYOF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITIONNO12908 0F 2015
Between:
Miss. Neha Vedre,D/o.Sri.Aurobindo Vedre Aged about26 years 3-6-131/1, Flat No 101 , Srinivasa Towers,Hyderguda, Hyderabad-29.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under section482 of cr.P.cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition, the High court may be pleased toquash theproceedingsfiled in cc. No. 91 of 2015on the file of the learned vlll Addl. chiefMetropolitanMagistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioner and pass such other orders
l.A. NO: 1OF 2015(CRLPMP.NO:'t2847 0F 20151
Petition under section482 of cr.P.cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition, the High court may be pleased to stayall further proceedings includingpetitioner's appearancerecall of non bailabtewarrants against the petitioner/Accused in, cc. No. 91 of 2015 on the fite of the Learned vlllAddl. chiefMetropolitan Magistrateat Hyderabadand pass
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S lndus Law Firm, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali, Assistant Public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITIONNo.129O8oF 201s
ORDER:
This criminal petition isliled seeking toquash the proceedings filed in C.C.No.91of 2O15 on the file of learned VIII. Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitiongr.
Miscellaneous Petitions,pending if any, shall stand clo^sed'
SD/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/TTRUE COPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2311112023
.- j' ':::-..._
r' .. -:.. i
-.I
o-
( ,<br>.it]l{ ;I
1[ I'r$
* l) C
ORDER
CRLP.No.12908 ot 2015
Dismissing the Criminal petition as infructuous
6
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed or dismissed on the ground of settlement out of court.
Whether the criminal petition survives after the parties have compromised the issues outside the court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Miss. Neha Vedre
The State of Telangana, rep. PP, High Court at Hyderabad
M/s Mabeerprasad Balkishan
E. V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
