In a criminal revision filed to quash lower court orders, the High Court of Telangana dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with no opposition from the State. Pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1508 OF 2017
Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Order dated 12-05-2017 made in Crl.M.P.No. 569 of 2017 in Crl.Appeal No.512 of 2017 on the file of the Cou( of the lV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad, preferred against the Order passed in Crl.MP.No.1930 of 2016 in D.V.C.No.68 of 2016 dated 28-03-2017 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
Mohammed Abdul Ghouse, Hyderabad, S/o- Shaik Mehboob, aged 33 years, Occ: Marketing Manager (Gamier and Loreal Professional) Rlo 2-2-6471230, Bagh Amberpet' central Excise colony' Hyderabad
...petitioner/ petitioner
AND
Respondents/petitioners
lA NO: 'l OF 2017
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders dt.28-03-2017 in Crl.M.P.No.1930 of 2016 in D.V.C.No. 68 of 2016 on the file of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri M V Suresh
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri Vizarath Ali, Asst. Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3 : None Appeared
The Court made the following : ORDER
THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
cRt:MINAL RIVISION CASE No.15O8 OF zOLz
ORDEf,I:
Learr: ed counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the case has become infructuous and therefore seeks to withdraw the criminal revision case. fearned counsel endorsed the same otr the bundle.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed
SO/. CH.VENKATESWARLU DEPUry REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
tb
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Y'R
NSw
l I I I I
HIGH COURT
DATED::2211112023
ORDER
CRLRC.ltlo.l 508 of 2017
.' ,l;;''t.t '.....-
23 i ,-. L1/ tilr. ,I
. '.,1_.
<br>
DISMISSING THE CRL. RC AS WITFIDRAWN
f, ofltd
Yl-
6f'-r
I
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammed Abdul Ghouse
The State of Telangana
Smt. Raheemunissa Begum
Master Mohammed Abdul Shahan Ali
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
