The High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings as infructuous, noting the accused were already acquitted by the lower court.
Criminal Petition No. 12655 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i I i l : i I t j I i
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAEAD
Is2ee ]
MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
Between:
CRIMINAL PETITION NO i 12655 0F 2014
swa th i Nasar' rheesarasuttapar r v vi rrase, [TrH "ff P^i;#if##Ar:iT
...PE flONER|ACCUSED NO.2 & 3
AND
petition under section 482 or cr.F.c -frayiirs'i;., in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to quash the proceedings in c.c.No.106/2013 0n the fire of Judiciar First Class Magistrate, Karimnagar.
NO:1 OF 2011}IC MP. NO: 13043 oF 20 141
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition,the High court may be pleased ro stay a, the proceedings in c.c.No.106/2013 on the fire of Judiciar First crass Magistrate, Karimnagar on such terms and conditions as this Hon,bre cou deems fit and proper.
Thispetitioh coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri K. Sai Babu, Advocate for the petitioner and the Assistant pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No..l
The Court made the following: ORDER
jI { I i r i I I
i
\
HO IIOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUI}OPAL C UMINAL PETITION No.12655 of 2OL4
ORDER:
Thir; c irninal petition is frled seeking trr rluash the proceedings n C.C.No.106 of 2013 agains;t the petitioners on the file c,f Jtrr icial First Class Magistrate, Kzrimna;.;ar
2
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal
petition, shall also stand closed.
ASSrsraifl#'G:Sm //'RUE coPY// se?PoH oFFlcER /
To, 213. iffi"cG The Judicial iiiE siiir" tH.uiJotricer, ih;Froril First Class Magistrate' Karimnagar'Fici*it6i Women Police Station' uign court ror the Karimnasar'state or relansana' TOUTI 4 5n'" CCto Sri K. Sai Babu' Advocate(OPUC) 5. TwoCD CoPies MBC -/ C.F-
HI(!H COURT
DATEID: 0310712023
z4 -<:-:' ',-at ''
,-e la) +.
I
a a.)
i1 [\lE ?$a
<br>
ORDER
CRLP.No.126'55 of 2014
DISMISSING THE CRlMll'l/\L PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOIJT COSTS
ge
7
(
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings should be allowed.
Whether the petition is infructuous due to previous acquittal of the accused.
Coli ponduram
The State of Telangana
E. V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
