The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR registered as illegal. The court observed the subject crime was closed as false on 31.12.2015, rendering the petition infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs; interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32es I
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
t FRIDAY,TH E THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
WR]T PETITION NO: 29000OF 2015
Between:
G.Subba Rao, S/o G.Ramulu,i aged about 38years, Occ:Business, Ryo 8/4, Block-8, Bahar SaharaStates,Mansoorabad,Hyderabad. ...'ET,T'ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
petition under Article 226'of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order or birection moreparticularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring theregistration of FlR.No.115of 2015 of Talakondapally police Station, Mahaboobnagar i District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of theconstitutionof lndia and consequently set-asidethe same
l.A. NO:'t OF 201 s(WPMP.NO: 37604OF 2015)
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High courtmay be pleased to stay all furtherproceedings in FlR.No.115 of 2015 of Talakondapally Police station, MahaboobnagarDistrict, including arrest of the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. P. NARASIMHULU Counsel for the RespondentNo.1&2: SRI' SAI RAM AGPREP GP FOR HOME Counsel for the RespondentNo.3: SRl. B. CHANDRASEN REDDY The Court made thefollowing: ORDER
I t
I 0
THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENL'GC,PAL IIIRIT PETITION NO.29OOO OF 20 15
ORDER:
The pt:t ition ,:r /i\ 1 filed the present u,ritper-i:io t under Article 226 of thr. Con,;titution of India seekingissLlzrrtce of writof Mandamus cle:li nng regrstration of FIR No.l .i: of 2015of Talakondapally Prl .ce Station, MahaboobnagirDistrictas illegal, arbitrarv ancL v,ol ,rlive of Articles 14 and 21 of thttlorrstitution of India and to :ict a ;i<le the same.
pending in this Writ Petition, shall also dismissed.
SD/. K. VENKAIAH /ITRUE , COPY// ASSISTANIREGISTRARQD sEcTtoN oFFrcER :
: To, 1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME,High Court for the State of Telangana,at Hyderabad [OUTI 2. One CC to SRl. P. NARASIMHULU, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRl. B. CHANDRASEN REDDY, Advocate IoPUCI 4. Two CD Copies i BM ] GJP W
HIGH COURT
DATED:3010611Ct23
ORDER
,tS.;<br>'1 l,ii\ Nri :
.. -:
WP.No.29000 of 2015,
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
7
ul:, Ire
$ (-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR registered as false need be disposed of.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Subba Rao
State of Telangana
Md. Azghar
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
