High Court dismissed Criminal Petition No. 6800 of 2015 as withdrawn by Counsel S. Madhavi upon permission granted by the Court; miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
Permission granted to withdraw the Criminal Petition, thereby dismissing it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6800 OF 2015
Between:
'1. Nalla Santosh Reddy, S/o.N.Bhooma Reddy
...PETITION ER/ACCUSED 1& 2
AND
.-.RESpoNDENr/coMpLArNANrs
Petrtion under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings C.C.No.363 of 2014 on the file the lX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
t.A. N o: 10F 2015lCRLPMP. NO: 6699 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the personnel appearance of the petitioner in connection with C.C.No.363 of 2014 on the file of the lX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing lhe Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. P. Srilatha, Counsel for Smt. S. Madhavi, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri M. Muralidhar, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Smt. Krishnaveni Advocate for Sri S. Sridhar, Advocate for Respondent NO. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON )I'RABLESRI JUSTICE E. V. VDIVUGOPAL
CRIII4INAL PETITION No.680O OF ilc)15;
ORDER
lVI s Ms ['. !''i atha, learnecl counse] rel)l( s:rnt ng S.Madhavi, 1er:-r'ecl counsel lor thc petitionr:rs s;tt[;mi:s that the cause ir-r t he c irninal petition does not surt irre, tl ert:fore seeks permission ol this Court to u,ithdras' thr: CrirLin:l Petition. Learned couns .'1 for the petitioners endorsr:d tn l sa ne on the bundle
appearing for tl e respondent State is present
withdrarvn
Miscellanr crrs Petitions, pencling if any, shall slanC closed.
\
Scl/- V. KAVITHA ASSISI'4NI REGISTRAR //rRUE coPY// s.(elfon oFFrcER //
MBCd
t I
r{t(iH couRT
DATI][): 301OG12023
ORDER
CRLP.NT>.6800 of 2015
,a='='=:::-=:
iAI e
. i.tdi1n"
/. $(
O I AUE zUA ('.
li,
.
DISMISSING THE CR.IMITII\L PETITION
AS \I/I]'HDARWN
v7
Nalla Santosh Reddy
Smt. Nalla Anupama
The State of Telangana
T Ram Singh
E. V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
