Dismissed

M/S Vishnusai Enterprises, R.R.Dist. v. P.P., Hyd and 2 Othrs

Telangana HC3 Nov 2023CRLP/12334/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal petitions under Section 482 CrPC filed by M/s. Vishnu Sai Enterprises to stay a common order in CC No. 605 of 2013 were dismissed as infructuous by the High Court of Telangana, accepting the petitioner's submission that the subject matter no longer survives.

What did the court decide?

Petitions were dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.

M/S Vishnusai Enterprises, R.R.Dist. Vs P.P… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE THIRD^DAY OF^NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY THREE}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{E.V. VENUGOPAL}

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NOS:12334, 12371AND 124640F2015}

¶6

CRL.P. o.1233412 1

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mis.Vishnu Sai Enterprises,^{Rep.by M.V Srinivasa Rao R/oG-3,} Qalcuiq^ne9p91qy. p.S.nio Nagar, Roab No.2, Dbminaiguda, Keesara Mandal, R.R.District' PIN 500 026

¶9

...PETITIONER/ComPlainant

¶10

AND

¶11

The state of Telangana,^{Rep.by its PublicProsecutor, HighCourt' Hyderabad'}

¶12

..ResPondent.

¶13

M/s.Jhansi Ores and^{Metals (P) Ltd.,Regd.Office at H.No. 12-13-548, Shubh} - fli*ai, Nagarjuna Nagar, Strbet No.1 4, Tarnaka, Secunderabad, Rep'by it Managing Partner, Sri^P.Hari.

¶14

P. Hari, Managing^{Partner, M/s. Jhansi Ores and Metals (P) Lrd} '^Regd'Office - at H.No. 12-15-545, Shubh Niwas, Nagarjuna Nagar, Street No 14, Tarnaka, Secunderabad.

¶15

...RESPONDENTs/Accused'

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C praying that in thecircumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminalPetition, the Highcourtmay} be pleased to^quash the Common^{orderpassedin Crl.M.P.No 2754ot 2O15'} 275;5 of 2015, and 2756 of 2015ⁱⁿ cc^{No. 605of 2013dated '15-10-2015by the} learned Xl Special Magistrale,^{Secunderabadat Hyderabad'}

¶17

CRLP MP. NO: 12326OF²⁰¹⁵

¶18

Petitiori under Section⁴⁸² of^{Ct.P .C prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminalPetition, the Highcourtmay} be pleased to stay all^{furtherproceedingsin Common orderpassedin} Crl.M.P.No. 2754 ot-2015,2755^{of 2015 &, 2756 of 2015 in CC No 605 of 2013} dated 15-10- 2015 by^{the learnedXl Special Magistrate, Secunderabad at} Hyderabad pending disposal of^{the criminal petition.}

-2

cRL.P.NO.12371l2015.

Between:

Ivl/s.Vishnu Sai Enterprises, Rep.by M.V.Srinivasa Rao R/o G-3, Saipuja Residency, P.S.Rao Nagar, Road No.2, Dammaiguda, Keesara Mandal, R.R.District, PIN 500 026

¶23

...PETlTlONERYComplainant

¶24

AND

¶25

1 The state of Telangana, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

¶26

..Respondent,

¶27

2 M/s.Jhansi Ores and Metals (P) Ltd., Regd.Office at H.No. 12-13-548, Shubh Niwas, Nagarjuna Nagar, Street No.14, Tarnaka, Secunderabad, Rep-by it Managing Partner, Sri P.Hari.

¶28

3 P. Hari, Ivlanaging Partner, M/s. Jhansi Ores and Metats (P) Ltd., Regd.Ofice at H.No. 12-13-548, Shubh Niwas, Nagarjuna Nagar, Street No. 1 4, Tarnaka, Secunderabad.

¶29

...RESPONOENTs/Accused.

¶30

Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Common order passed in Crl.M.P.No. 2754 ot 2015, 2755 of 2015, and 27 56 ot 2015 in CC No. 605 of 2013 dated 15-10-2015 by the learned Xl Special Magistrate, Secunderabad at Hyderabad.

¶31

QBLPMP- Nq:12347 oF 2o1 5

¶32

Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Common order passed in Crl.M.P.No. 2754 of 2015,2755 of 2015 &,2156 of 2015 in CC No. 605 of 2013 dated^'15-10- 2015 by the learned Xl Special Magistrate, Secunderabad at Hyderabad pending disposal of the criminal petition.

¶33

cRL.P.NO.12464/201s.

¶34

Between:

¶35

M/s.Vishnu Sai Enterprises, Rep.by M.V.Srinivasa Rao R/o G-3, Saipuia Residencv. P S.Rao Nagar, Road No.2, Dammaiguda, Keesara Mandal, R.R.District, pttt SO'Ci 026

¶36

...PETlTlONERYComplainant

¶37

-3-

¶38

AND

¶39

The state^{of Telangana,Rep.by its PublicProsecutor, High Cou(, Hyderabad.}

¶40

..ResPondent.

¶41

M.Jhansi^{Ores and Metals(P) Ltd., Regd.Officeat H.No 12-13-548, Shubh} Niwas, Nagarjuna^{Nagar, StreetNo.1 4, Tarnaka,Secunderabad, Rep.by it} Managing^Partner, Sri^P.Hari.

¶42

P. Hari,^{ManagingPartner, M/s. Jhansi Ores and Metals (P) Ltd., Rggd.Office} at H.No.^{12-15-548,Shubh Niwas,Nagarluna Nagar, StreetNo 14, Tarnaka,} Secunderabad.

¶43

...RESPONDENTs/Accused.

¶44

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr.P.C praying that in thecircumstances} stated in the^{Memorandum of Grounds of criminalPetition, the Highcourtmay} be^{pleased to quash the Common order passed in Crl M.P.No. 2754 of 2015'in} CC No. 605^{of 2013dated 15-10-201 5 by the learnedXl Special Magistrate,} Secunderabad^{at HYderabad.}

¶45

CRLPMP^{. NO:12453 0F2015}

¶46

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr.P.C praying that in thecircumstances} stated in^{the Memorandum of Grounds of criminalPetition, the High court may} be pleased to^{stay all furtherproceedingsin Common order passedin} Crl.M.P.No.^{2754of 2015, in CC No. 605 of 2013 dated 15-10-2015 by the} learned xl special^{Magistrate, secunderabadat Hyderabadpending disposal of} the criminal Petition.

¶47

This Petitions coming^{on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of criminal^{Petitions and uponhearing the argumentsof sri D-Madhava} Rao, Advocate^{for the Petitionei in all the Petitions andthe Public Prosecutor on} behalf of the^{RespondentNo.1 in all the Petitions and of sri P.Ramachandran,} Advocate for^{the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in all the Petitions.}

¶48

The Court^{made the following ORDER:}

¶49

¶50

THE HONOURABLE sRI JUSTICE E. v. vENUGioPAL

¶51

CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.12334 L2371 end, 12464 0F 2015

¶52

COMMON ORDER:

¶53

These Criminal^petitions are filed under Section 4g2 Cr.p.C, seeking to stay of operation of the common order dated 15.lO.2O15 passed in Crl.M.p.Nos.2ZS4,2ZSS and.2T56 of 2Ol5 in C.C.No.6O5 of 2Ol3 by the learned XI Special Magistrate, Secunderabad at Hyderabad.

¶54

Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the subject matter of the cases does not survive. Therefore, seeks to dismiss these Criminal petitions as infructuous.

¶55

Mr. Vizarath Ali, learned Assistant public prosecutor appearing for the respondent State takes no objection to the sarne.

¶56

Recording the submission made by both the learned counsel, these crimina-t petition are dismissed as infructuous.

¶57

Miscellaneous^petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶58

SD/- A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 The Xl Special Magistrate, Secunderabad at Hyderabad

¶63

2 One CC to SRl. D.MADHAVA RAO Advocate [OPUC]

¶64

3 O1e-"CC to SRl. P.RAMACHANDRAN. Advocate [OPUC]

¶65

4 ontcGto sRl. PUBLTC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. {@FUef CO \Il)

¶66

5 Two CD copies.

cvk \Qr-

HIGH COURT

DATED:0311112023

.1
I
I'
,.
.t',.. . t',.. .

¶72

ORDER I' ,. .t',.. . t',.. . CRLP.Nos.12334, 12371 & 12464 oiZOtS

¶73

Crl.P. is Dismissed as Infructuous.

¶74

8 Gd"'
w
G-"w

M/S Vishnusai Enterprises, R.R.Dist. v. P.P., Hyd and 2 Othrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Vishnusai Enterprises, R.R.Dist. v. P.P., Hyd and 2 Othrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thogara Venkateswarlu, Khm Dist. Vs Thogara Pedda Atchaiah, Khm Dist. and 2 Othrs

K. Shekher Reddy, Hyd Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Arimalla Anuradha, Hyd., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Kasula Sriniivas Vs Kasula @ Korupuri Thulasi

Naved Ali , Md. Aslam Ali, Hyd and 4 Othrs Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano

T.Hanmandlu , H.L.Tamlurkar, Maharastra State Vs Public Prosecutor, Nizamabad Dist and Another