Dismissed

T.Hanmandlu , H.L.Tamlurkar, Maharastra State v. Public Prosecutor, Nizamabad Dist and Another

Telangana HC3 Nov 2023CRLP/10338/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashal of proceedings. The High Court held the petition was infructuous as the underlying criminal complaint had already resulted in the acquittal of the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition C.C.No. 128 of 2015 was dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions to be closed.

T.Hanmandlu , H.L.Tamlurkar, Maharastra State Vs Public… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.^VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION No: 10338^{0F 20'ts}

¶6

Between:

¶7

'1. Theppawar Hanmandlu , H.L.Tamlurkar, S/o Laxman @ Lachiram, Fi/o Anku Nag-ai, Taroda, Nanded District, Maharastra^State'

¶8

...Petitioner/Accused

¶9

AND

¶10

(

¶11

The tate Of Telangana, rep by Public^{Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.}

¶12

Sri Mallari Swami, S/o Venkatesham,^{aged about45 Years, R/o Madnoor} Village / and Mandal, Nizamabad^District.

¶13

...ResPondenUComPlainant

¶14

Petition under Section 482 oI^{Cr.P.C Prayingthat in the Circumstances} Stated^{in the Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay} be pleased to quash the^{proceedingsin C.C.No. 128 of 2015on the file of the} Court of the Judicial First Class^{Magistrate, Bichkunda, Nizamabad District.}

¶15

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015^{(CRLPMP.NO:10349 0F 2015)}

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C Prayingthat in the Circumstances} Stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court maybe} pleased to grant stay of all further^proceedings in C.C'No.^{128of 2015 on the file} of the court of the Judicial First^{class Magistrate,Bichkunda, Nizamabad District,} including appearance of ttie^{petitioner, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.}

¶17

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, Upon Perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of Crirr-rinal Petition and^{upon hearingthe argumentsof Sri T SUJAN} KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner,^{and The Assitant PublicProsecutorSri'} VIZARATH ALl, and on behalf of^{the RespondentNo.1, and of Sri.SATISH} KUMAR, for the Respondent No.2.

¶18

The Couit mahe the following: ORDER

¶19

I I

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL}

¶21

CRIMINAL PBIITION No.1O338^{oF 2015}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

The present criminal^petition is^{filed toquashthe} proceedings ifl C.C.No. 128 of 2015 on^{the hle of the Court of the} Judicial First Class Magistrate,^{Bichkunda,Nizamabad District} and pass such orders as^{the Court deems fit and proper.}

¶24

Mr. Vizarath AIi, Learned^{Assistant Public Prosecutor is} present and would submit that cause in^{criminal petitiondoes} not survive as the C.C.No.128^{of 2015 on 14.12.2021on the file} of Junior Civil Judge, Bichkunda,^{NizamabadDistrict whichhas} been sought to be^quashed has^{been ended up in acquittingthe} petitioners herein, hence seeks to dismiss^{the criminal petition as} infructuous.

¶25

Learned counsel for the^{petitioner and learned counsel for} the unoflicial respondent are^{present and concedeto the said} submissions of the learned^{Assistant Public Prosecutor.}

¶26

Recording the submissions^{made by the learned Assistant} Public Prosecutor and learned counsel^{for the petitionerand}

¶27

¶28

unofficial^{respondent,this Court is inclined to dismiss this}

¶29

¶30

Criminal^{Petitionas infructuous}

¶31

Accordingly,^{thecriminal petition isdismissedas}

¶32

infructuous.

¶33

Miscellaneous^{Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.}

¶34

//TRUE COPY//

¶35

Sd/. V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANTqIG|STRAR ,/

¶36

SECTIOX OFFICER

¶37

To,

¶38

The Judicial^{First Class Magistrate,} Bichkunda, Nizamabad District.

¶39

The Station^{HouseOfficer,} Marrcor^police Station, Nizamabad District

¶40

Two ccs^{to the Public Prosecutor,} High court for the state of rerangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTj

¶41

The One^{CC to Sri. T SUJAN} KUMAR, Advocate IOPUCI

¶42

. One CC^{to Sri. SATISH KUMAR} VARMA, Advocate tOpUCl

¶43

Two CD^CoPies

ANV

cu(u

I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:3/1112023

gE STATe o
(
d 1? ttB zstt 57a
oo Q
J.,
A
t DEsPAic

¶51

ORDER

¶52

CRLP.No.10338 of 2O15

¶53

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶54

,r\k.#

T.Hanmandlu , H.L.Tamlurkar, Maharastra State v. Public Prosecutor, Nizamabad Dist and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Hanmandlu , H.L.Tamlurkar, Maharastra State v. Public Prosecutor, Nizamabad Dist and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thogara Venkateswarlu, Khm Dist. Vs Thogara Pedda Atchaiah, Khm Dist. and 2 Othrs

K. Shekher Reddy, Hyd Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Arimalla Anuradha, Hyd., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

M/S Vishnusai Enterprises, R.R.Dist. Vs P.P., Hyd and 2 Othrs

Kasula Sriniivas Vs Kasula @ Korupuri Thulasi

Naved Ali , Md. Aslam Ali, Hyd and 4 Othrs Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano