In a Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC, the State Prosecutor submitted that the underlying case (C.C. No. 942 of 2014) was disposed of. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous without further hearing.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[329e I
IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO; ll 162 OF 2014
Between:
...Petitioner/Accused Nos.l & 2.
AND
...Respondent/f)c-facto Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC No. 942 of 2014 on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 20r4(CRLPMP. NO: 11244 OF 20141
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 942 of 2014 on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad including appearance of the petitioners/Accused No. I to 2 pending disposal of Criminal petition.
This ['etition coming on fbr hearing, upon perusing the Memoranclum of Crounds ol Crirninal Petition and upon hearing the argumerlts of Ms. Ctr Sirisha, learned Counsel representing Sri G TIRUPATHI RE.DI)Y, Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri Vizarath Ali, Assistant Public Prosecutor, on behall'of the Responderrt No.l, None appeared lor the Respondent No.2.
The Court made thc following:
I I
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E'V'VENUGOPAL
PETITIONNo. rt162 oF2o14 CRIMINAL
ORDER:
ThiscriminalPetitionisfiled seekingtoquashthe proceedingsin C C'No'942 of 2Ol4 on the file of X Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate' CityCriminalCourtsat Secunderabadfor the offencesunder Section190(1) (a) Cr'P C' r/usection 2OO Cr'P'C'
2
dated 28. 12.2017 inC.C.No.942of 2Ol4 on the iile olthe learned X Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magrstrate at Secunderabad. To substantiatethe sarne, learnedAssistant Public Prosecutorfiled online copy of the e-court proct:edings'
Miscellaneouspetitions, ifany, pendingin this criminal petition, shall stand closed.
//TRUECOPY//
Sd/-A.'V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANTIIEGISTRAR ( -znfc,
SECTIoNOFFICER
5.Two CD CoPtes SP
pr &
HIGH COURT
EVV,J
DATED:03/08/2023
ORDER
ST ATT o
7
,]) rtt 1@ ..) l
1t
'_) i'
1<-
CRLP.No.lll62 of 2014
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DIMISSED AS INF'RUCTUOUS @+i'.' Uq-...-6t\P
2 issues framed by the court
Whether proceedings under the CrPC ought to be quashed as infructuous due to the underlying case being already disposed of.
Whether High Court can dismiss a criminal petition before adjudicating merits when the trial court has already disposed of the case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T. Rajkumar Goud
Mrs. Aruna
The State Of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
