The High Court Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear or submit any representation despite notice to appear on the listed date. No substantive matter was processed.
Nothing granted; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3253 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OFNOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICEM.G.PRIYADARSINI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1012 OF 201'l
Appeal Under Section 23 of Railway ClaimsTribunal Act, 198-7 agll'lql !f'e Judgmeht and Decree dated 20.04.2010made in M A NO.S oI 2010 in OA ll (U) ruo.589 of 2009 on the file of the Courtof RailwayClaims Tribunal,Secunderabad Bench, at Secunderabad.
Between:
G.Maddilety, Sio.Karre Maddilety,R/o.Lalasaheb Dharga, Kondapeta, Dhone, Kurnool District.
...AppellanUPetitioner
AND
Union Of lndia, rep by theGeneral Manager,SoulhCentralRailway O/o.Secunderabad.
...ResPondent
Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRl.B PARAMESEWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents:KALVALASANJEEV
The Court delivered the following:JUDGMENT
l-r-f'
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTI CE M.G.PRIYADARSINI
CTVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 1012 OF 2O11
JUDGMENT:
in spite of giving fair opportunities, as there was no representation for the appellant on the earlier ocr:asion, the matter, which pertains to the year 2Ol l, was dire.cted to be listed today under the caption 'For Dismissal,. Bven t:rday, there is no representation for the appellant. It is presumt:d that the appellanl is not inte rested to proceed lr.ith the appeal.
Hence, thc Civil Misccllanoous Appcal is dismissed lor non-prosccu tion. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stancl
closed
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-K.SRINIVASARAO JOINT REGISTRAR
l
SECTION OFFICER
To '1. The Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench, at Secunderabad 2 One CC to SRl.B PARAMESEWARARAO Advocate [OPUC]
t$.
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:2111112023
JUDGMENT
CMA.No.1012 ot2011
1$ E STATe
(
r
)I o
12 tl[fl ?[2[
,+
*
I
D E PA1
CMA IS DISMISSEDFOR NON PROSECUTION
P
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Maddilety
Union Of India
M.G.PRIYADARSINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
