Court dismissed a civil revision petition under Section 22 of A.P. Building (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act as infructuous because the subject matter of the revision had become infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s31
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICEM.G.PRIYADARSINI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 37 OF2019
Petition under Section 22 of A.P. Building(Lease, Rent & Eviction)Control Act the order dated'15.12.2016 in R.C.No.3080f 20100n the file of lV Additional Rent Controller at Hyderabad, confirmingthe order daled 23.1O.2O'18 passed in R.A.No.76 oI 2017 on the file ofAdditional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.
Between:
All are R/o.Shop No. 4-1-966,1st Floor,Abids, Hyderabad
...PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENT(TENANT IN R.C.)
AND
Smt. lmrana Qutubuddin, Rep.by herGPA Holder, Mr.MirAli Adil' S/o.Sri Mir Laiq Ali, Age 41years, Occdusiness,Rl/o.H.No 5-9-95,NizamVillah' Chappal Road, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONERLANDLADYIN R.C
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High court may be pleased to deposit rent at the contractualrate of Rs.962.50 per month, pending main revision petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRI K. ANUP KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent:--'
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARSINI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 37 of 2Ol9
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that nothing survives in the revision for adjudication as the subject matter of the revision has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission of the learned counsel, the
Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
There sha11 bc no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REG]STRAR V
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011112023
ORDER
CRP.No.37 of 2019
1 HE SIAT c
(
c
oo 1 I JAI'I 2$21
t o /: PA:r L r!
DISMISSING THE CIV!L REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
M/s. Totaram Papalal Sons
Mr. Suresh Kumar Gupta
Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta
Mr. Deepak Gupta
Smt. Imrana Qutubuddin
M.G. Priyadarsini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
