Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- According to the plaintiff, he is the absolute owner of suit schedule property having purchased the same from defendant No. 3, who in turn purchased the same from defendant No. 2. It is also stated that on 31.01.2015, the defendant No. 1, who is happened to be rhe neighbour of the plaintiff, being the o',r,ner of plot bearing No. 462 admeasuirng 13O sq.yards in survey Nos. 751 and 752, has started illegal constructions by encroaching the suit schedule property. Hence, the suit by the plaintiff. Pending the suit, the plaintiff filed I.A. No. 150 of 2015 seeking ad interim injunction against the defendant No. 1 till disposal of the suit. Initially, the Trial Court granted ex parte temporary injunction on 24.03.2075 and later, on contest by the defendant No. 1, vide order dated 03.O8.2015, allowed the I.A. making absolute the ex parte temporary injunction till disposal of the suit. Aggrieved thereby, the defendant No. 1 liled an appeal before the lower appellate Court. On contest, the lower appellate Court by the impugned order allowed the appeal setting aside the orders passed by the trial Court by vacating the ad interim injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff. Hence, the present revision petition by the plaintiff.
