In this contempt case filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court found that the respondents were not in willful violation of its earlier order due to pending litigation. The court closed the contempt case without imposing punishment.
The contempt case is closed and adjourned miscellaneous petitions stand settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3296 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No : 863 0F 2023
contempl case filed under sections 10 ro 12 of contempt of courts Act to punish lhe respondents herein for willfully and disobeying / deliberately violating the brders of the High court dated 23-03-2022 passed in l.A.No.1 0f zo2e in wp.tlo.6210 0f 2023.
Between:
Sunkari Shiva Kumar Shivauah, S/o Late Ushan, age 49 years, Occ: RTC. conductor Rli-o-H.No1-1-5/1,9^?!"SVgI"Sar cotony Eediguni Rrej RoaO N" ZO opp-Vaiist'na Degree college, NTR Marg Road Nirmal Town and district.
...PETITIONERYPETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRt.c.L.NARASIMHA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2:SRt.SR|KANTH REDDy /c.p FOR REVENUE
counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI.B.JAGAN MADHAV RAo
The Court made the following ORDER
I
HoN BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR RT)ODY
OONTEMPT CASE No.863 of2023
ORDER:
T.-tis C) mtempLChse is filcd by the petLtione- rrllc3iug the n,illful a r-rd d, Ii rerate violation ol the order passed :1, th s Court in W.P.No.ti2 lC of 2023 dated 03.O3.2O23.
2.\ ide above order, this Court grarLrld interim direction tc) '-hc respondcnts therein not to allc vr. any construr;ticnr ry encroaching the public park c r- thc roads shou'n in t re layout No.47 of Da2 in Sy .tlo.1552 of Bhagvanagar cr,1ony of Nirmal town and District.
3.A .ltging non compiiance of the or. ler piri:;ed by this Court, the p -e sent Contempt Case came to be f ited by the petitione'r.
(-.C.\0 3(rl ot202l dl 08 06.2021
2
situated in layout layout No.47 of 1982 inSy.No.1652 .of Bharyanagar colony of Nirmal town andDistrict.
( ( ,) rol ,l I l.l tlr arrr,I,l:
-)
As a s, q rel, the miscellaneous petitrons pen:r ng, i[ an1 , shall st,ancl c o:;etl
S di.B.{iATYAVATHI DEPI.'TY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
p
:ir:,cTt,f,N oFFtcER
To
SA
.
HIGH COUiT'T
DATED:0811612023
ORDER
CC.No.863 tf 2023
,,:. \ 1ii Si47 (:
t
ia
t ,..'
<br>l*..i\ )r-c. .
.+=i
CLOSING C F THE CONTEMPT CASE
WITHOUT(:OSTS.
(i
Sunkari Shiva Kumar Shivauah
Arvind Kumar
Varun Reddy
CVN Raau
Subhash Chandr
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
