The High Court, hearing a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with its earlier order, was informed that the relevant order had been complied with. The Court observed this fact and closed the case against the respondents without ordering any costs.
The contempt case is closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{.1 r
#
oF TELANGANA rN rHEH|GH ".rTffl$rH"BlfE
FRIDAY. THEFIRST DAY OF DECEI4BER TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTYTHREE ,
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLEMRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
CONTEMPTCASE NO: 2'175 OF 2023
{
t I
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA NTEMPT A EN L7 2
ORDER:
Heard Mr.S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel appearang on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.R.Vinodh Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TSSPDCL, appearing on behalf of the respondents.
"Taking into consideration, the orders of the Division Bench of this Court dated, 19.06.2020 passed in W.A.No.192 of 2O2O and subsequent final orders dated 03.03.2021 passed in W.A.No.192 of 2020, the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 are directed to re-consider the application of the petitioner dated 28.06.2023 for grant of additional load in respect of HT service connection No.MBN523 and pass appropriate orders, in accordance to law, within a period of four(O4) weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this
2
,cc.No.2rTsoflY
order without refere to the proceeclings, dated 27 .07 .2023 vide ,.. nnt" r/D,No274/20rr,,,,"j";;1onli1Hft"j:l?11,r,1"'j, Operation Circle/TSSp dependent or tne previou?to:"..:"nto'bnagar'and in-
4 In response to the order of this Court dated 10.tL.2023, officials concerned are present before this Court.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall sta nd closprt
SD/.T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
1 One CC to Sri. R.S. Associates Advocate [OpUC] 2 9n.99to Sri. R Vinod Reddy (SC for TSTRANSCO) Advoc€te [OPUC] 3 Two CD Copies. YIR MY O\IL
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 11212023
ORDER
CC.No.2175 ol2O23
-(6a StAtg o
7
Ltr
1? FiB ?[2t
oof,
s
t
*n
i'51:
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's complaint of violation of the earlier order warrants punishment for contempt.
Whether the respondents had complied with the substantive order dated 08.08.2023.
Apex One Infra Pvt. Ltd.
Hakar Rao
Murali Krishna
Sri. Alla
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
