Smt.Akula Narmada v. Smt. S. Pankaja
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive decision rendered. The contempt case was closed by the High Court of Telangana after the standing counsel submitted that the respondents had complied with prior orders by passing a speaking order on a subsequent date. No order was passed as to costs.
What the court decided
x[ 3230 ]
l I l
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTHDAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHAKANNEGANTI
CONTEMPT CAS E NO: 1987 OF 2022
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to l2 of Contemptof CourtsAct to punish the respondents herein for willful and deliberate, disobeying, disobedience orders of the High Court daled 12.04.2022 hW.P. No.31608 ol2021 .
Between:
Smt.Akula Narmada, Wo.A.S.Ramesh, age 40 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o.H.No.5-3-582/2/A, Vijayapuri Colony, Phase-2, Vanashalipuram, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy Distric'
...PETITIONER
AND
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Akula Narmada
- respondent
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
- respondent
M. Madhusudhan Reddy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1987/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court