Petitioner in a contempt case sought punishment for alleged violation of a prior High Court order. Petitioner's counsel submitted that the respondent had implemented the order. The court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
Case closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t.
[3230 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1814OF 2022
Contempt Case Under Section 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for, willfully violating, the Order of the High Court dated 31812022passed in W.P. No. 2651612022.
Between:
Lankala Krishna Reddy, S/o. Lankala Annatha Reddy, Aged about 81 years, Occ . Business 6-3-596/63-9, Flat No.6, Anugruha Apartments Naveen Nagar, Eramanzil, Nampally, Somajiguda, Hyderabad 500 082, Telangana State
...PETITIONER
AND
P ft/ohan Reddy, The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation(GHMC), Circle No. 10, Erramanzil, Khairatabad Hyderabad, Telangana.
...CONTEMNOR
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M/s. OM LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent: SRl. K SIDDHARTH RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1814 of 2022
ORDER:
The Contempt Czrse is filed seeking the following relief
"... to punish the respondents bv invoking the provisions of the Sections 1O to12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps as per the Contempt o[ Courts Act, 1q7l in accordance with law for willful wanton and deliberate disobedience of rhe order dated 03.08.2022 in W.P.No.26516 of 2022, in the interest ofjustice ancl .. .'.
respondents have implemented the orders of this court.
costs.
The miscellaneous :rpplicirtions. if anv shall stand automatically rn
closed.
\
SD/- M. MANJULA i' oeirJivnEctsrnan ",/
//TRUECOPY// secribi.roFFlcER
"''3"1g".?3ll"li311r3):3:i:'1,:"ilp::s:l'f'fr fl '":iIJ3:l''!i:'1xH3:'
igl#g USt I€ ;,?r,hflt5rli'f'1'&!3'iJ353i'
TJ
\ v
HlGH COURT
DATED:2410212023
ORDER
CC.No.1814 of 2022
{HE S i'4 /4<br><br>,^<br>o rl
t)
10 lrAY 2[a
;
CLOSING THE CC
sl
<br>&
Lankala Krishna Reddy
P ft/ohan Reddy
Lalitha Kanne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
