The High Court at Hyderabad disposed of a contempt case filed for willful disobedience of orders. The respondent submitted steps were taken per court orders, leading the court to close the contempt case without costs or further orders.
The contempt case was closed without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32301
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 176 OF 2023
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 1O to 12of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for willful and deliberate disobedience of Orders of the High court dated 0610112022 passed in wpNo.2B29s ot 2022
Between
chouhan Mahadev, s/o. Vilas Bheemrao chouhan, Age- 35 years, occPrivate works, R/o. H. No. 3-s-1 19, Nakashi wada, Korufla proper and Mandal, Jagtial District.
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER
AND
sri. Ayaz, commissioner, The Korufla Municipality, Korufla, Jagtial District.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. K VENUMADHAV
Counsel forthe Respondents: B JAGAN MADHAVA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I ? t I i :, :
I
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA I(ANNEGANTI
ORDER:
The contempt case is fired seeking the following relief:
""' to punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience and utter disregard to the orders of this Hontle court passed in w.p.No.28 zii ot2022dared 06.07. 2022 ancr ....,,. 2' sri B. Jagan Madhav Rao, rearned standing counser for the respondents submits that they have passed orders on 23.07.2,22pursuant to the orders passed by this court and hence, the orders of this court are complied with
3' Mr' K' Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he gave a representation asking the respondents to take furthe. steps and the same is not taken by the respondents.
4' Pursuant to the orders passed by this court, the respondents have passed the orders on 23.07.2022.If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said orders passed by the respondents, it is always open to him to assail the same.
5 Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
I
The miscellaneous applications, if any shall stand automatically clgsed.
SD/. K. SAILESHI DEPUWREGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,'1. one CC to SRI K. VENUMADHAVAdvocate IOPUC] 2. one CC to SRI B. JAGAN MADHAVA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies KKS ee,i
HIGH COURT
DATED i2410212023
ATE o,*
L i.
it'
i\ \t$'s
.,1
.i,i ::..:!' '
i_r-r,i;:.n; ji .1 '-' ''
ORDER
CC.No.176 ot 2023
CLOSING OF THE CC
E-
J*1d"t-
chouhan Mahadev
sri Ayaz
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
