Petitioner filed a writ for reclassification of pay scale and arrears, claiming violation of Articles 14 and 16. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's statement and dismissed pending miscellaneous petitions as well. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I l i
13167 l
I ! I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 6232 OF 2OO4
Between:
M.Alqntlla Ramulu, S/o Rangiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Watchman (Retd.) AP.GENCO KTPS., Palonch, Khammam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cou( may be pleased to issue a direction, writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned procds. in lt/emo No.CEI/O&M/KTPS/ADM/85/D.No.219l2OO2 dt. 20.'11.2002 issued by the 1'r respondent and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, malafidy, violative of Art. 14& 16 of the constitution of lndia and contrary to the principles of naturaljustice and consequently direct the respondents to fii thepay-scale of the petitioner to that of the unofficial respondents and pay the arrears of salary in the interest of Justice.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2004(WP MP. NO: 8087 OF 2004)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the difference of arrears of pay on notional basis, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. P. REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI V. UMA DEVI, S.C. FOR GENCO
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRIIUSTICEA. ABHISHEKREDDY
WRIT PETITION No.6232of 2004
ORDER:
The leamed counsel for thepetitioner states that the subject
matter of this writ petitionhas become infructuous.
Recording the said statement,the Writ Petitionis dismissed
as infructuous.
Pending MiscellaneousPetitionsshall also standdismissed'
No order as to costs.
SD/-N.SRIHARI ASStsrANrllffilsrRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MP SB
6
,u I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410412023
,._ st4
/
'ii
I
[ 6 JU''! 2$I]
ORDER
WP.No.6232 of 2004
D!SMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
5
(^
\\l!-y
M. Alqntlla Ramulu
Chairman cum Managing Director, APGENCO
Chief Engineer (O & M), KTPS
Executive Director, Human Resources, APGENCO
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
