R Chinna Peddanna v. K.Ravinder Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, the High Court dismissed the petition and closed the proceedings without costs, holding the impugned order complied with.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT cASE NO: 1016 OF 2023
contempt case under sections 10 ro 12 0f contempt of courts Act 1g71 to punish the Respondents for wilfufly viorating the orders passed by this Hon,bre court dated 20.09.2022in\Np. No.17982 of 2004.
Between:
n C!1nL Ped!911a, S/o Gangaram, Occ: Former -lncharge Cashier The Karimnagar age 60 vears Disrrict co-oo centrar Bank t-td Gangadhiia"Br";;'l;giti;r iiil#;g* District Ryo H No 1-2-171 (rishnanagir JiS,trl.-- "-*"'
...Petitioner
AND
K.Ravinder f99, gOed lvlajor Occupation. president The Karimnagar District Coop Central Bank Limited.Karimnagar
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N Chilipilla
- respondent
K. Ravinder Rao
Coram
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1016/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court