The High Court of Telangana dismissed an appeal filed for partition and separate possession without representation from the appellant's counsel. The matter was treated as non-prosecuted and set aside.
Dismissal of the appeal suite for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERASAD
TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
Appearuno"r a*ffient
and Decree Dated
2310311998 made in o.s. No.52 0f rgg3 0n the fire of th€ court of the senior civir
Judge, Miryalaguda
Between:
Ande Narayann a, Wto. Ram_aiah Agriculture R:/o. ponugudu Village of Garidepally Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...APPELLANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant: SRt. E.V. PRAKASH RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. y. SRINIVASA MURTHY
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
r\
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SR.EE SUDHA No.448of2oo8
JUD G ME NT:
. This appeal suit is filed against the Judgment and decree dated 23.O3. 1998 passed in O.S.No.S2 of 1993, by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda.
2
present appeal and accordingly the appeal suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
' As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/- K. SHYLESHI DEPUTY REGIST
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
$
HIGH COURT
DATED:1411112O23
JUDGMENT
AS.No.448 of 2008
S \ ATC ,.-\a
q 'ffi, l
$1irr
:)oo
1,",
*
DISMISSING THE AS FOR NON PROSEUCTION
o
3
@
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal shall be dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Ande Narayanna
Mekala Lakshmaiah
Golra Narayanamma
Mekala Somaiah
Mekala Lingaiah
Bologetty Mahalaxmamma
Justice P.Sree Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
