Partly allowed

Sangu Goverdhan Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Telangana HC21 Feb 2022WP/9165/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a land revenue petitioner challenging the rejection of his e-pattadar passbook application. The Court set aside the rejection order and directed the respondent to reconsider the application within two months.

What did the court decide?

Rejection order (Transaction Id G1M2100216592) set aside; Respondent directed to reconsider and issue e-pattadar passbook within two months.

Sangu Goverdhan Reddy Vs The State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Speciat Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

IMONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 9165 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sanou Goverdhan Reddv, S/o.^{S. Rami Reddy, Age.57years, Occ Business'} R/o." H,No.2-'12-325, Vidyaranyapuri^{Colony'Hanamkonda'HanamKonoa} District.

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of^{Telangana, Rep by its.PrincipalSecretary' Revenue} Department,^{Secretariat, Hyderabao'}

¶11

The District^{Collector, Hanamkonda District at Hanamkonda'}

¶12

¶13

The Tahsildar,^{Kamalapur lvlandal' Hanamkonda District}

¶14

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition^{underArticle 226 of the-Co't:li!'tl:lof lndia praying that in the}

¶17

...----==-

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶19

Petition under section 151 cPC^{praying thatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High court may be pleasedto} direct the 2nd respondent to issue the E- Pattedar^{Passbookin favour of the} petitioner by enabling the Digital Signature, in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 2.36 gts. in Sy. No. 423/3, (Old Sy No. 423), situated at Ambala Village, Kamalapur Mandal, Hanamkonda District by suspending the re.iection order passed by the 2nd respondent in Dharani Portal status vide transaction ld No.G1M2100216592 in the interest of justice pending disposal of above writ petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. S.SURENDER REDDy

¶21

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE B, VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.9165 of 2O22

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent^No.2 in rejecting his application No.G1M2100216592^{submitted in} Dharani Portal for issuance^{of e-pattadarpassbooksin respect of} the land in an extent^{of Ac.2.36 guntas inSy'No'423/3} (Old Sy.No.a23) situated^{at Ambala Village, Kamalapur Mandal'} Hanmakonda District^{withsingle line order'grievance rejected"}

¶27

Learned^{AssistantGovernmentPleader submitted that} appropriate^{orders be Passed'}

¶28

In view^{of the above'without going into the meritsof the} matter,^{the imPugned reiection order is set aside as reasonshave} ondent^{No'z is directedto reconsider} not^{been recorded^The resp} 2lOOZL65g2of^{the petitioner submittedvide} the^{aPPlicationNo'GLM} nce^{of e-pattdar passbookby issuing notice} Dharani^{Portalfor issua} rders^{in accordance with law ' The entire} to^{all concernedand Pass o} within^{a period of two (2) months from} exercise^{shall be comPleted} the^{date of receiPt of a coPY of thi} s order' Pending^{miscellaneous} The^writ .^{Petitionis disposedof} e shall^{be no order as to} petitions,^{if any' shall stand closed' Ther} SDI^-v.suDHA RAR ASSIS^{TANT REGIST} costs. IITRUE^COPYI' SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

10,, ',t$:::il:::;."::".:":::l::"":::::"-

¶30

The Tahsildar, Kamalapur Mandal, Hanamkonda District 4. One CC to SRt. S.SURENDER REDDY Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE ,High Courl for the State of Telangana. touTl

¶31

Two CD Copies.

¶32

One Spare Copy.

GB \ ," LS

HIGH COURT

DATED:21 10212022

t,.E STA
o.
J
J
a.
I

ORDER

WP.No.9165 of 2022

DISPOSING OF THE WP

WITHOUT COSTS.

Sangu Goverdhan Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangu Goverdhan Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salukuti Surender Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Salukuti Surender Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

T.Yadagiri Vs The State of Telangana

Janupala Shekar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

C. Nagender Vs State of Telangana

K.Dinesh Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others